Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape. / Harris, Stephanie; Bishop, Charles Michael; Bond, Sarah et al.
Yn: Current Biology, 14.01.2025.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

Harris, S., Bishop, C. M., Bond, S., Fernandes, P. G., Guilford, T., Lewin, P. J., Padget, O., Robins, P., Schneider, W., Waggitt, J., Wilmes, S.-B., & Cordes, L. (2025). Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape. Current Biology. Cyhoeddiad ar-lein ymlaen llaw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.017

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Harris S, Bishop CM, Bond S, Fernandes PG, Guilford T, Lewin PJ et al. Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape. Current Biology. 2025 Ion 14. Epub 2025 Ion 14. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.017

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape

AU - Harris, Stephanie

AU - Bishop, Charles Michael

AU - Bond, Sarah

AU - Fernandes, Paul G

AU - Guilford, Tim

AU - Lewin, Patrick J

AU - Padget, Oliver

AU - Robins, Peter

AU - Schneider, Will

AU - Waggitt, James

AU - Wilmes, Sophie-Berenice

AU - Cordes, Line

PY - 2025/1/14

Y1 - 2025/1/14

N2 - Understanding the movements of highly mobile animals is challenging because of the many factors they must consider in their decision-making. Many seabirds, for example, are adapted to use winds to travel long distances at low energetic cost1,2,3 but also potentially benefit from targeting specific foraging hotspots.4,5,6 To investigate how an animal makes foraging decisions, given the inevitable trade-off between these factors, we tracked over 600 foraging trips of breeding Manx shearwaters (Puffinus puffinus; N = 218 individuals) using GPS accelerometers. By first uncovering the relationships between wind and the flapping effort put into flight, we show that shearwaters, while generally wind selective, adjust their wind selectivity, apparently balancing flight costs against the benefits of travel toward known targets. This is supported by a number of scenarios that alter the balance between maximizing flight efficiency and goal-oriented flight. First, shearwaters exhibit lower wind selectivity during homing movement when constrained to target-driven navigation toward the colony. Second, when wind speeds are low, flight costs vary little with travel direction, which shearwaters respond to by reducing wind selectivity in their outbound commutes, again favoring target-driven movement toward presumably memorized foraging areas. Finally, birds are also less wind selective during longer continuous periods of flight, presumably also associated with target-oriented movement. Our findings reveal how an animal’s foraging strategy can dynamically optimize the complex trade-off between efficient travel and accessing known foraging areas, implying the incorporation of prior knowledge of the cost-benefit landscape well beyond the range of what can be detected directly.

AB - Understanding the movements of highly mobile animals is challenging because of the many factors they must consider in their decision-making. Many seabirds, for example, are adapted to use winds to travel long distances at low energetic cost1,2,3 but also potentially benefit from targeting specific foraging hotspots.4,5,6 To investigate how an animal makes foraging decisions, given the inevitable trade-off between these factors, we tracked over 600 foraging trips of breeding Manx shearwaters (Puffinus puffinus; N = 218 individuals) using GPS accelerometers. By first uncovering the relationships between wind and the flapping effort put into flight, we show that shearwaters, while generally wind selective, adjust their wind selectivity, apparently balancing flight costs against the benefits of travel toward known targets. This is supported by a number of scenarios that alter the balance between maximizing flight efficiency and goal-oriented flight. First, shearwaters exhibit lower wind selectivity during homing movement when constrained to target-driven navigation toward the colony. Second, when wind speeds are low, flight costs vary little with travel direction, which shearwaters respond to by reducing wind selectivity in their outbound commutes, again favoring target-driven movement toward presumably memorized foraging areas. Finally, birds are also less wind selective during longer continuous periods of flight, presumably also associated with target-oriented movement. Our findings reveal how an animal’s foraging strategy can dynamically optimize the complex trade-off between efficient travel and accessing known foraging areas, implying the incorporation of prior knowledge of the cost-benefit landscape well beyond the range of what can be detected directly.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.017

M3 - Article

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

ER -