StandardStandard

Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. / Ahmed, Warish; Bertsch, Paul; Bivins, Aaron et al.
Yn: Science of the Total Environment, Cyfrol 739, 139960, 15.10.2020.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Ahmed, W, Bertsch, P, Bivins, A, Bibby, K, Farkas, K, Gathercole, A, Haramoto, E, Gyawali, P, Korajkic, A, McMinn, B, Mueller, J, Simpson, S, Smith, W, Symonds, E, Thomas, K, Verhagen, R & Kitajima, M 2020, 'Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater', Science of the Total Environment, cyfrol. 739, 139960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

APA

Ahmed, W., Bertsch, P., Bivins, A., Bibby, K., Farkas, K., Gathercole, A., Haramoto, E., Gyawali, P., Korajkic, A., McMinn, B., Mueller, J., Simpson, S., Smith, W., Symonds, E., Thomas, K., Verhagen, R., & Kitajima, M. (2020). Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 739, Erthygl 139960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

CBE

Ahmed W, Bertsch P, Bivins A, Bibby K, Farkas K, Gathercole A, Haramoto E, Gyawali P, Korajkic A, McMinn B, et al. 2020. Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. Science of the Total Environment. 739:Article 139960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Ahmed W, Bertsch P, Bivins A, Bibby K, Farkas K, Gathercole A et al. Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. Science of the Total Environment. 2020 Hyd 15;739:139960. Epub 2020 Meh 5. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

Author

Ahmed, Warish ; Bertsch, Paul ; Bivins, Aaron et al. / Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. Yn: Science of the Total Environment. 2020 ; Cyfrol 739.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater

AU - Ahmed, Warish

AU - Bertsch, Paul

AU - Bivins, Aaron

AU - Bibby, Kyle

AU - Farkas, Kata

AU - Gathercole, Amy

AU - Haramoto, Eiji

AU - Gyawali, Pradip

AU - Korajkic, Asja

AU - McMinn, Brian

AU - Mueller, Jochen

AU - Simpson, Stuart

AU - Smith, Wendy

AU - Symonds, Erin

AU - Thomas, Kevin

AU - Verhagen, Rory

AU - Kitajima, Masaaki

PY - 2020/10/15

Y1 - 2020/10/15

N2 - There is currently a clear benefit for many countries to utilize wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) as part of ongoing measures to manage the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Since most wastewater virus concentration methods were developed and validated for nonenveloped viruses, it is imperative to determine the efficiency of the most commonly used methods for the enveloped severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Municipal wastewater seeded with a human coronavirus (CoV) surrogate, murine hepatitis virus (MHV), was used to test the efficiency of seven wastewater virus concentration methods: (A–C) adsorption-extraction with three different pre-treatment options, (D–E) centrifugal filter device methods with two different devices, (F) polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) precipitation, and (G) ultracentrifugation. MHV was quantified by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the recovery efficiency was calculated for each method. The mean MHV recoveries ranged from 26.7 to 65.7%. The most efficient methods were adsorption-extraction methods with MgCl2 pre-treatment (Method C), and without pre-treatment (Method B). The third most efficient method used the Amicon® Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Method D) and its recovery efficiency was not statistically different from the most efficient methods. The methods with the worst recovery efficiency included the adsorption-extraction method with acidification (A), followed by PEG precipitation (F). Our results suggest that absorption-extraction methods with minimal or without pre-treatment can provide suitably rapid, cost-effective and relatively straightforward recovery of enveloped viruses in wastewater. The MHV is a promising process control for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance and can be used as a quality control measure to support community-level epidemic mitigation and risk assessment.

AB - There is currently a clear benefit for many countries to utilize wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) as part of ongoing measures to manage the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Since most wastewater virus concentration methods were developed and validated for nonenveloped viruses, it is imperative to determine the efficiency of the most commonly used methods for the enveloped severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Municipal wastewater seeded with a human coronavirus (CoV) surrogate, murine hepatitis virus (MHV), was used to test the efficiency of seven wastewater virus concentration methods: (A–C) adsorption-extraction with three different pre-treatment options, (D–E) centrifugal filter device methods with two different devices, (F) polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) precipitation, and (G) ultracentrifugation. MHV was quantified by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and the recovery efficiency was calculated for each method. The mean MHV recoveries ranged from 26.7 to 65.7%. The most efficient methods were adsorption-extraction methods with MgCl2 pre-treatment (Method C), and without pre-treatment (Method B). The third most efficient method used the Amicon® Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Method D) and its recovery efficiency was not statistically different from the most efficient methods. The methods with the worst recovery efficiency included the adsorption-extraction method with acidification (A), followed by PEG precipitation (F). Our results suggest that absorption-extraction methods with minimal or without pre-treatment can provide suitably rapid, cost-effective and relatively straightforward recovery of enveloped viruses in wastewater. The MHV is a promising process control for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance and can be used as a quality control measure to support community-level epidemic mitigation and risk assessment.

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960

M3 - Article

VL - 739

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

M1 - 139960

ER -