TY - JOUR

T1 - Not belonging where others do: A cross-sectional analysis of multi-level social capital interactions on health and mental wellbeing in Wales

AU - Saville, Christopher

N1 - no embargo upon publication

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - Background: Social capital may be a social good in health terms, but it is not necessarily a universal good. Several studies have shown that while there is a positive association between ecological social capital and health in people with high individual-level social capital, this relationship is weaker or even reversed in those with low individual-level social capital. Such studies, however, have used relatively coarse levels of geography for quantifying ecological social capital. The present study looks at this relationship at a more fine-grained spatial scale.Methods: Data from the National Survey for Wales (n=27,828, weighted mean age=48.4) were linked with previously published small-area estimates (n=410) of ecological social capital for Wales. Mixed effects models were then used to assess whether the relationship between mental wellbeing and self-reported health on one hand, and ecological social capital (sense of belonging) on the other, was moderated by individual-level social capital.Results: The models found the same moderation of the relationship that has been demonstrated previously: Although ecological social capital is positively associated with health in respondents with high individual-level social capital, the relationship is negative in those with low individual-level social capital.Conclusion: This study replicates this association at a spatial scale orders of magnitude more fine-grained than had been shown previously. Ecological social capital is not an unambiguously positive factor for public health, and may be a risk factor for marginalised people.

AB - Background: Social capital may be a social good in health terms, but it is not necessarily a universal good. Several studies have shown that while there is a positive association between ecological social capital and health in people with high individual-level social capital, this relationship is weaker or even reversed in those with low individual-level social capital. Such studies, however, have used relatively coarse levels of geography for quantifying ecological social capital. The present study looks at this relationship at a more fine-grained spatial scale.Methods: Data from the National Survey for Wales (n=27,828, weighted mean age=48.4) were linked with previously published small-area estimates (n=410) of ecological social capital for Wales. Mixed effects models were then used to assess whether the relationship between mental wellbeing and self-reported health on one hand, and ecological social capital (sense of belonging) on the other, was moderated by individual-level social capital.Results: The models found the same moderation of the relationship that has been demonstrated previously: Although ecological social capital is positively associated with health in respondents with high individual-level social capital, the relationship is negative in those with low individual-level social capital.Conclusion: This study replicates this association at a spatial scale orders of magnitude more fine-grained than had been shown previously. Ecological social capital is not an unambiguously positive factor for public health, and may be a risk factor for marginalised people.

KW - Social capital

KW - geography

KW - mental health

KW - multilevel modelling

KW - self-rated health

U2 - 10.1136/jech-2020-215188

DO - 10.1136/jech-2020-215188

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 349

EP - 356

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 4

ER -