Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study. / Saville, Christopher; Thomas, Daniel Rhys.
Yn: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Cyfrol 76, Rhif 6, 06.2022, t. 544-549.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Saville, C & Thomas, DR 2022, 'Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, cyfrol. 76, rhif 6, tt. 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-217360

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Saville C, Thomas DR. Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2022 Meh;76(6):544-549. Epub 2022 Chw 28. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-217360

Author

Saville, Christopher ; Thomas, Daniel Rhys. / Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study. Yn: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2022 ; Cyfrol 76, Rhif 6. tt. 544-549.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social capital and geographical variation in the incidence of COVID-19: an ecological study

AU - Saville, Christopher

AU - Thomas, Daniel Rhys

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - Background The new behavioural norms needed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 are likely scaffolded by social capital. Research on social capital and COVID-19 has yielded mixed results, with some studies finding it to be protective while others identifying it as a risk factor. We examined the association between social capital and COVID-19 at a finer spatial scale than previous research, and examined changes in the relationship over the course of the pandemic.Methods Routine COVID-19 surveillance data from Wales were linked to estimates of social capital at a small area level. Generalised linear mixed effects models predicting COVID-19 case rates across areas using social capital estimates and possible confounding variables were fitted to the data. A moving window version of the analysis explored whether this relationship varied across time.Results Areas with higher levels of social capital had lower rates of COVID-19 (rate ratio for trust=0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96; rate ratio for belonging=0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96). These associations were strongest during periods of lockdown, with evidence that social capital was less protective, and potentially even a risk factor, during periods when restrictions were eased. Trust, but not belonging, remained protective after adjusting for deprivation, population density, ethnicity and proportion population aged over 65 years.Conclusions Social capital is an important public health resource, which should be considered in future pandemic preparedness. Its importance may be greatest during times when social activity is most restricted.

AB - Background The new behavioural norms needed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 are likely scaffolded by social capital. Research on social capital and COVID-19 has yielded mixed results, with some studies finding it to be protective while others identifying it as a risk factor. We examined the association between social capital and COVID-19 at a finer spatial scale than previous research, and examined changes in the relationship over the course of the pandemic.Methods Routine COVID-19 surveillance data from Wales were linked to estimates of social capital at a small area level. Generalised linear mixed effects models predicting COVID-19 case rates across areas using social capital estimates and possible confounding variables were fitted to the data. A moving window version of the analysis explored whether this relationship varied across time.Results Areas with higher levels of social capital had lower rates of COVID-19 (rate ratio for trust=0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96; rate ratio for belonging=0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96). These associations were strongest during periods of lockdown, with evidence that social capital was less protective, and potentially even a risk factor, during periods when restrictions were eased. Trust, but not belonging, remained protective after adjusting for deprivation, population density, ethnicity and proportion population aged over 65 years.Conclusions Social capital is an important public health resource, which should be considered in future pandemic preparedness. Its importance may be greatest during times when social activity is most restricted.

KW - Aged

KW - COVID-19/epidemiology

KW - Communicable Disease Control

KW - Humans

KW - Incidence

KW - Pandemics

KW - Social Capital

U2 - 10.1136/jech-2021-217360

DO - 10.1136/jech-2021-217360

M3 - Article

C2 - 35228294

VL - 76

SP - 544

EP - 549

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 6

ER -