StandardStandard

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of insulin delivery by continuous subcutaneous infusion compared to multiple daily injections. / Blair, Jo ; Gregory, John ; Hughes, Dyfrig et al.
Yn: Trials, Cyfrol 16, 163, 16.04.2015.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Blair, J, Gregory, J, Hughes, D, Ridyard, C, Gamble, C, McKay, A, Didi, M, Thornborough, K, Bedson, E, Awoyale, L, Cwiklinski, E & Peak, M 2015, 'Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of insulin delivery by continuous subcutaneous infusion compared to multiple daily injections', Trials, cyfrol. 16, 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0658-5

APA

Blair, J., Gregory, J., Hughes, D., Ridyard, C., Gamble, C., McKay, A., Didi, M., Thornborough, K., Bedson, E., Awoyale, L., Cwiklinski, E., & Peak, M. (2015). Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of insulin delivery by continuous subcutaneous infusion compared to multiple daily injections. Trials, 16, Erthygl 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0658-5

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of insulin delivery by continuous subcutaneous infusion compared to multiple daily injections

AU - Blair, Jo

AU - Gregory, John

AU - Hughes, Dyfrig

AU - Ridyard, Colin

AU - Gamble, Carol

AU - McKay, Andrew

AU - Didi, Mohammed

AU - Thornborough, Keith

AU - Bedson, Emma

AU - Awoyale, Lola

AU - Cwiklinski, Emma

AU - Peak, Matthew

PY - 2015/4/16

Y1 - 2015/4/16

N2 - BackgroundIntensive insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) devices or multiple daily injections (MDI) reduces the risk of long-term vascular complications of type I diabetes (TID). Both treatments are used routinely, but there is little evidence to demonstrate superiority of either treatment. If CSII treatment reduces the risk of long-term complications or is associated with an improved quality of life (QoL), the additional cost of this therapy may be compensated for by a reduction in long-term health expenditure. If there is no demonstrable difference between treatments, health-care resources may be better invested elsewhere. This study aims to address this gap in knowledge.Methods/designThis is a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Fifteen centres, selected to represent a population with a broad demographic, will recruit 316 patients, newly diagnosed with TID, aged between 7 months and 15 years. Exclusion criteria include additional pathologies or treatments likely to affect glycaemic control and a first-degree relative with TID. Randomisation to CSII or MDI is stratified for age, gender and recruiting centre. The randomised treatment starts within 15 days of diagnosis. Patients will be trained to adjust their insulin dose according to carbohydrate intake and blood glucose level.Study visits coincide with routine clinic appointments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months when data relating to routine clinical assessments, adverse events and concomitant medications are collected. Health utilities questionnaires are completed at each visit and a diabetes-specific QoL questionnaire (PedsQL) at diagnosis, 6 and 12 months.The primary outcome is glycaemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include QoL, insulin use, growth and weight gain, adverse events and a health economics appraisal.DiscussionThis is the first adequately powered RCT comparing CSII and MDI in a non-selected population, treated according to standard practice guidelines. It will produce data that are meaningful to individual patients and local and national policymakers.

AB - BackgroundIntensive insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) devices or multiple daily injections (MDI) reduces the risk of long-term vascular complications of type I diabetes (TID). Both treatments are used routinely, but there is little evidence to demonstrate superiority of either treatment. If CSII treatment reduces the risk of long-term complications or is associated with an improved quality of life (QoL), the additional cost of this therapy may be compensated for by a reduction in long-term health expenditure. If there is no demonstrable difference between treatments, health-care resources may be better invested elsewhere. This study aims to address this gap in knowledge.Methods/designThis is a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Fifteen centres, selected to represent a population with a broad demographic, will recruit 316 patients, newly diagnosed with TID, aged between 7 months and 15 years. Exclusion criteria include additional pathologies or treatments likely to affect glycaemic control and a first-degree relative with TID. Randomisation to CSII or MDI is stratified for age, gender and recruiting centre. The randomised treatment starts within 15 days of diagnosis. Patients will be trained to adjust their insulin dose according to carbohydrate intake and blood glucose level.Study visits coincide with routine clinic appointments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months when data relating to routine clinical assessments, adverse events and concomitant medications are collected. Health utilities questionnaires are completed at each visit and a diabetes-specific QoL questionnaire (PedsQL) at diagnosis, 6 and 12 months.The primary outcome is glycaemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include QoL, insulin use, growth and weight gain, adverse events and a health economics appraisal.DiscussionThis is the first adequately powered RCT comparing CSII and MDI in a non-selected population, treated according to standard practice guidelines. It will produce data that are meaningful to individual patients and local and national policymakers.

KW - Type 1 Diabetes

KW - Child

KW - Infant

KW - Insulin pump

KW - Multiple daily insulin injections

KW - Randomised controlled trial

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-015-0658-5

DO - 10.1186/s13063-015-0658-5

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 163

ER -