The Freedom of Archaeological Research: Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond)

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

The Freedom of Archaeological Research: Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond). / Karl, Raimund.
Yn: Public Archaeology, Cyfrol 15, Rhif 1, 2016, t. 23-39.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Karl R. The Freedom of Archaeological Research: Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond). Public Archaeology. 2016;15(1):23-39. doi: 10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228

Author

Karl, Raimund. / The Freedom of Archaeological Research : Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond). Yn: Public Archaeology. 2016 ; Cyfrol 15, Rhif 1. tt. 23-39.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Freedom of Archaeological Research

T2 - Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond)

AU - Karl, Raimund

N1 - Published online 02/05/2017

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Archaeologists like to think that heritage protection laws serve the purpose of protecting all archaeology from damage. Thus, provisions like that of §11 (1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz or Art. 3 i-ii of the Valletta Convention are interpreted as a blanket ban on archaeological fieldwork ‘unauthorized’ by national heritage agencies, and a general prohibition against archaeological field research by non-professionals. The Austrian National Heritage Agency, the Bundesdenkmalamt, interprets the Austrian law in this way. Using the Austrian example as a case study, this paper demonstrates that this interpretation must be wrong, since, if it were true, it would revoke a fundamental civil right enshrined both in the Austrian constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: the unconditional freedom of research, which applies to archaeological field research as to any other kind of academic research, and extends equally to every citizen.

AB - Archaeologists like to think that heritage protection laws serve the purpose of protecting all archaeology from damage. Thus, provisions like that of §11 (1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz or Art. 3 i-ii of the Valletta Convention are interpreted as a blanket ban on archaeological fieldwork ‘unauthorized’ by national heritage agencies, and a general prohibition against archaeological field research by non-professionals. The Austrian National Heritage Agency, the Bundesdenkmalamt, interprets the Austrian law in this way. Using the Austrian example as a case study, this paper demonstrates that this interpretation must be wrong, since, if it were true, it would revoke a fundamental civil right enshrined both in the Austrian constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: the unconditional freedom of research, which applies to archaeological field research as to any other kind of academic research, and extends equally to every citizen.

KW - ARCHAEOLOGY

KW - LAW

KW - Civil rights

KW - Austria

KW - Europe

U2 - 10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228

DO - 10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 23

EP - 39

JO - Public Archaeology

JF - Public Archaeology

SN - 1465-5187

IS - 1

ER -