The Freedom of Archaeological Research: Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Public Archaeology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2016, p. 23-39.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Freedom of Archaeological Research
T2 - Archaeological Heritage Protection and Civil Rights in Austria (and Beyond)
AU - Karl, Raimund
N1 - Published online 02/05/2017
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Archaeologists like to think that heritage protection laws serve the purpose of protecting all archaeology from damage. Thus, provisions like that of §11 (1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz or Art. 3 i-ii of the Valletta Convention are interpreted as a blanket ban on archaeological fieldwork ‘unauthorized’ by national heritage agencies, and a general prohibition against archaeological field research by non-professionals. The Austrian National Heritage Agency, the Bundesdenkmalamt, interprets the Austrian law in this way. Using the Austrian example as a case study, this paper demonstrates that this interpretation must be wrong, since, if it were true, it would revoke a fundamental civil right enshrined both in the Austrian constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: the unconditional freedom of research, which applies to archaeological field research as to any other kind of academic research, and extends equally to every citizen.
AB - Archaeologists like to think that heritage protection laws serve the purpose of protecting all archaeology from damage. Thus, provisions like that of §11 (1) Austrian Denkmalschutzgesetz or Art. 3 i-ii of the Valletta Convention are interpreted as a blanket ban on archaeological fieldwork ‘unauthorized’ by national heritage agencies, and a general prohibition against archaeological field research by non-professionals. The Austrian National Heritage Agency, the Bundesdenkmalamt, interprets the Austrian law in this way. Using the Austrian example as a case study, this paper demonstrates that this interpretation must be wrong, since, if it were true, it would revoke a fundamental civil right enshrined both in the Austrian constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: the unconditional freedom of research, which applies to archaeological field research as to any other kind of academic research, and extends equally to every citizen.
KW - ARCHAEOLOGY
KW - LAW
KW - Civil rights
KW - Austria
KW - Europe
U2 - 10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228
DO - 10.1080/14655187.2016.1266228
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 23
EP - 39
JO - Public Archaeology
JF - Public Archaeology
SN - 1465-5187
IS - 1
ER -