Towards a model of collaborative organizational autoethnography: The more the merrier?
Allbwn ymchwil: Pennod mewn Llyfr/Adroddiad/Trafodion Cynhadledd › Pennod › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
The Routledge International Handbook of Organizational Autoethnography. gol. / Andrew Herrmann. 1. gol. London: Routledge, 2020. t. 399-414.
Allbwn ymchwil: Pennod mewn Llyfr/Adroddiad/Trafodion Cynhadledd › Pennod › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Towards a model of collaborative organizational autoethnography: The more the merrier?
AU - Sambrook, Sally
AU - Doloriert, Clair
PY - 2020/7/17
Y1 - 2020/7/17
N2 - n this chapter, the authors share how they write together to reflect on and give voice to our joint personal experiences to extend sociological understanding through organizational autoethnography (OAE). They question whether ‘more’ is ‘merrier’ and develop a collaborative autoethnographic story about our own writing collaboration. Having introduced our analytic/diagnostic model, the chapter focuses on the (inter-related) elements, weaving in reflections on the delights and dilemmas (and political/emotional difficulties, disasters) of writing collaborative organizational autoethnographies. Boyle and Parry state that the prime focus of an OAE is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Thinking of the different types of OAE, the authors probably focus more on evocative and critical rather than analytical, focusing on developing novice teachers in higher education, and power and emotion in doctoral supervision. The authors co-produce OAEs with doctoral students in different organizations within the public sector, including health and social care.
AB - n this chapter, the authors share how they write together to reflect on and give voice to our joint personal experiences to extend sociological understanding through organizational autoethnography (OAE). They question whether ‘more’ is ‘merrier’ and develop a collaborative autoethnographic story about our own writing collaboration. Having introduced our analytic/diagnostic model, the chapter focuses on the (inter-related) elements, weaving in reflections on the delights and dilemmas (and political/emotional difficulties, disasters) of writing collaborative organizational autoethnographies. Boyle and Parry state that the prime focus of an OAE is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Thinking of the different types of OAE, the authors probably focus more on evocative and critical rather than analytical, focusing on developing novice teachers in higher education, and power and emotion in doctoral supervision. The authors co-produce OAEs with doctoral students in different organizations within the public sector, including health and social care.
KW - COMMUNICATION
KW - BUSINESS
KW - Industry
U2 - 10.4324/9780429056987
DO - 10.4324/9780429056987
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9780367174729
SP - 399
EP - 414
BT - The Routledge International Handbook of Organizational Autoethnography
A2 - Herrmann, Andrew
PB - Routledge
CY - London
ER -