StandardStandard

Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad. / Tuersley, Lorna; Quaye, Naa Amua; Pisavadia, Kalpa et al.
Yn: PLoS ONE, Cyfrol 20, Rhif 1, 10.01.2025, t. 1-22.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad

AU - Tuersley, Lorna

AU - Quaye, Naa Amua

AU - Pisavadia, Kalpa

AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor

AU - Bray, Nathan

PY - 2025/1/10

Y1 - 2025/1/10

N2 - Background and objective: Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.Methods: Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.Results: Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.Conclusions: The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.

AB - Background and objective: Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.Methods: Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.Results: Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.Conclusions: The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.

KW - Patient centred

KW - outcome measures

KW - wheelchair budgets

KW - Assessment

UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39792936/

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0312967

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0312967

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

ER -