Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation,

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation, / Woods, Bob; Williams, Jenny; Diep, Martina et al.
Yn: Aging and Mental Health, Cyfrol 25, Rhif 7, 03.07.2021, t. 1351-1360.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Woods, B, Williams, J, Diep, M, Parker, R, James, J & Diggle, J 2021, 'Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation,', Aging and Mental Health, cyfrol. 25, rhif 7, tt. 1351-1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1765315

APA

Woods, B., Williams, J., Diep, M., Parker, R., James, J., & Diggle, J. (2021). Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation, Aging and Mental Health, 25(7), 1351-1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1765315

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Woods B, Williams J, Diep M, Parker R, James J, Diggle J. Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation, Aging and Mental Health. 2021 Gor 3;25(7):1351-1360. Epub 2020 Mai 18. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1765315

Author

Woods, Bob ; Williams, Jenny ; Diep, Martina et al. / Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation,. Yn: Aging and Mental Health. 2021 ; Cyfrol 25, Rhif 7. tt. 1351-1360.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who benefits most from resilience-building groups for ‘at-risk’ older people? a pilot service-evaluation,

AU - Woods, Bob

AU - Williams, Jenny

AU - Diep, Martina

AU - Parker, Rowan

AU - James, Julia

AU - Diggle, Jacob

PY - 2021/7/3

Y1 - 2021/7/3

N2 - Objectives: Resilience-building interventions have not yet targeted older adults, despite the importance of well-being for maintaining independence and health. The ‘My Generation’ programme aims to build resilience through greater access to social networks, well-being activities, and psycho-educational support; this paper examines service evaluation data from its pilot implementation to identify factors leading to positive outcomes.Method: The ‘My Generation’ programme comprises eight weekly 2-hour group sessions; each session includes both psychoeducation and a well-being activity. Participants were invited to complete questionnaires at the start and end of the course, and 12 weeks later. These included measures of well-being, loneliness, social connections and self-efficacy.Results: Baseline assessments were completed by 239 older people (average age 71, range 50-97), attending 38 courses in four centres. Most were female (80%), 40% were widowed, 25% divorced/separated and 64% lived alone. Demographics did not differ between those completing post-intervention assessments (N = 137) and those who did not. Compared with normative data, participants had significantly lower well-being and greater feelings of loneliness than age-peers. Significant improvements in well-being, self-efficacy, social connections and one measure of loneliness were evident at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. Improvement in well-being at post-intervention was greater in those who were divorced/separated and who were not carers, and at follow-up in females and those living alone.Conclusion: The ‘My Generation’ package appeared effective in improving well-being, self-efficacy, social connections and aspects of loneliness in at-risk older people. More research is needed to identify the intervention’s key components and possible between-centre differences in outcomes.

AB - Objectives: Resilience-building interventions have not yet targeted older adults, despite the importance of well-being for maintaining independence and health. The ‘My Generation’ programme aims to build resilience through greater access to social networks, well-being activities, and psycho-educational support; this paper examines service evaluation data from its pilot implementation to identify factors leading to positive outcomes.Method: The ‘My Generation’ programme comprises eight weekly 2-hour group sessions; each session includes both psychoeducation and a well-being activity. Participants were invited to complete questionnaires at the start and end of the course, and 12 weeks later. These included measures of well-being, loneliness, social connections and self-efficacy.Results: Baseline assessments were completed by 239 older people (average age 71, range 50-97), attending 38 courses in four centres. Most were female (80%), 40% were widowed, 25% divorced/separated and 64% lived alone. Demographics did not differ between those completing post-intervention assessments (N = 137) and those who did not. Compared with normative data, participants had significantly lower well-being and greater feelings of loneliness than age-peers. Significant improvements in well-being, self-efficacy, social connections and one measure of loneliness were evident at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. Improvement in well-being at post-intervention was greater in those who were divorced/separated and who were not carers, and at follow-up in females and those living alone.Conclusion: The ‘My Generation’ package appeared effective in improving well-being, self-efficacy, social connections and aspects of loneliness in at-risk older people. More research is needed to identify the intervention’s key components and possible between-centre differences in outcomes.

KW - Self-efficacy

KW - well-being

KW - prevention

KW - psychoeducation

KW - loneliness

U2 - 10.1080/13607863.2020.1765315

DO - 10.1080/13607863.2020.1765315

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1351

EP - 1360

JO - Aging and Mental Health

JF - Aging and Mental Health

SN - 1360-7863

IS - 7

ER -