A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
DOI
Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 119 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Nov 2014 |