Research Portal

A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard Standard

A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. / France, E.F.; Ring, N.; Thomas, R. et al.
In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 14, No. 119, 19.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

HarvardHarvard

France, EF, Ring, N, Thomas, R, Noyes, J, Maxwell, M & Jepson, R 2014, 'A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 14, no. 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

APA

France, E. F., Ring, N., Thomas, R., Noyes, J., Maxwell, M., & Jepson, R. (2014). A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(119). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

CBE

France EF, Ring N, Thomas R, Noyes J, Maxwell M, Jepson R. 2014. A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 14(119). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

MLA

France, E.F. et al. "A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting". BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014. 14(119). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

VancouverVancouver

France EF, Ring N, Thomas R, Noyes J, Maxwell M, Jepson R. A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014 Nov 19;14(119). doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

Author

France, E.F. ; Ring, N. ; Thomas, R. et al. / A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 119.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

AU - France, E.F.

AU - Ring, N.

AU - Thomas, R.

AU - Noyes, J.

AU - Maxwell, M.

AU - Jepson, R.

PY - 2014/11/19

Y1 - 2014/11/19

N2 - Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.

AB - Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 119

ER -