Standard Standard

A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. / Maughan, Ronald J.; Watson, Philip; Cordery, Philip A.A. et al.
In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 103, No. 3, 03.2016, p. 717-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Maughan, RJ, Watson, P, Cordery, PAA, Walsh, NP, Oliver, SJ, Dolci, A, Rodriguez-Sanchez, N & Galloway, SDR 2016, 'A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 717-723. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

APA

Maughan, R. J., Watson, P., Cordery, P. A. A., Walsh, N. P., Oliver, S. J., Dolci, A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, N., & Galloway, S. D. R. (2016). A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103(3), 717-723. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

CBE

Maughan RJ, Watson P, Cordery PAA, Walsh NP, Oliver SJ, Dolci A, Rodriguez-Sanchez N, Galloway SDR. 2016. A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 103(3):717-723. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Maughan RJ, Watson P, Cordery PAA, Walsh NP, Oliver SJ, Dolci A et al. A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016 Mar;103(3):717-723. Epub 2015 Dec 23. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

Author

Maughan, Ronald J. ; Watson, Philip ; Cordery, Philip A.A. et al. / A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index. In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 717-723.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index

AU - Maughan, Ronald J.

AU - Watson, Philip

AU - Cordery, Philip A.A.

AU - Walsh, N.P.

AU - Oliver, S.J.

AU - Dolci, Alberto

AU - Rodriguez-Sanchez, Nidia

AU - Galloway, Stuart D.R.

N1 - European Hydration Institute PP in not ok to add folder as can't be used according to S/R

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - Abstract Background: The identification of beverages that promote longer-term fluid retention and maintenance of fluid balance is of real clinical and practical benefit in situations in which free access to fluids is limited or when frequent breaks for urination are not desirable. The postingestion diuretic response is likely to be influenced by several beverage characteristics, including the volume ingested, energy density, electrolyte content, and the presence of diuretic agents. Objective: This study investigated the effects of 13 different commonly consumed drinks on urine output and fluid balance when ingested in a euhydrated state, with a view to establishing a beverage hydration index (BHI), i.e., the volume of urine produced after drinking expressed relative to a standard treatment (still water) for each beverage. Design: Each subject (n = 72, euhydrated and fasted male subjects) ingested 1 L still water or 1 of 3 other commercially available beverages over a period of 30 min. Urine output was then collected for the subsequent 4 h. The BHI was corrected for the water content of drinks and was calculated as the amount of water retained at 2 h after ingestion relative to that observed after the ingestion of still water. Results: Total urine masses (mean ± SD) over 4 h were smaller than the still-water control (1337 ± 330 g) after an oral rehydration solution (ORS) (1038 ± 333 g, P < 0.001), full-fat milk (1052 ± 267 g, P < 0.001), and skimmed milk (1049 ± 334 g, P < 0.001). Cumulative urine output at 4 h after ingestion of cola, diet cola, hot tea, iced tea, coffee, lager, orange juice, sparkling water, and a sports drink were not different from the response to water ingestion. The mean BHI at 2 h was 1.54 ± 0.74 for the ORS, 1.50 ± 0.58 for full-fat milk, and 1.58 ± 0.60 for skimmed milk. Conclusions: BHI may be a useful measure to identify the short-term hydration potential of different beverages when ingested in a euhydrated state. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN13014105.

AB - Abstract Background: The identification of beverages that promote longer-term fluid retention and maintenance of fluid balance is of real clinical and practical benefit in situations in which free access to fluids is limited or when frequent breaks for urination are not desirable. The postingestion diuretic response is likely to be influenced by several beverage characteristics, including the volume ingested, energy density, electrolyte content, and the presence of diuretic agents. Objective: This study investigated the effects of 13 different commonly consumed drinks on urine output and fluid balance when ingested in a euhydrated state, with a view to establishing a beverage hydration index (BHI), i.e., the volume of urine produced after drinking expressed relative to a standard treatment (still water) for each beverage. Design: Each subject (n = 72, euhydrated and fasted male subjects) ingested 1 L still water or 1 of 3 other commercially available beverages over a period of 30 min. Urine output was then collected for the subsequent 4 h. The BHI was corrected for the water content of drinks and was calculated as the amount of water retained at 2 h after ingestion relative to that observed after the ingestion of still water. Results: Total urine masses (mean ± SD) over 4 h were smaller than the still-water control (1337 ± 330 g) after an oral rehydration solution (ORS) (1038 ± 333 g, P < 0.001), full-fat milk (1052 ± 267 g, P < 0.001), and skimmed milk (1049 ± 334 g, P < 0.001). Cumulative urine output at 4 h after ingestion of cola, diet cola, hot tea, iced tea, coffee, lager, orange juice, sparkling water, and a sports drink were not different from the response to water ingestion. The mean BHI at 2 h was 1.54 ± 0.74 for the ORS, 1.50 ± 0.58 for full-fat milk, and 1.58 ± 0.60 for skimmed milk. Conclusions: BHI may be a useful measure to identify the short-term hydration potential of different beverages when ingested in a euhydrated state. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN13014105.

U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

DO - 10.3945/ajcn.115.114769

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 717

EP - 723

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 3

ER -