Academic performance and financial forecasting performance:A survey study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

In a survey of forecasting stock prices over 13 months, we find better academic performance is significantly associated with smaller absolute forecasting errors, a lower propensity to be overconfident and narrower prediction intervals. The latter two findings are surprising as one would expect that less overconfident forecasters are more likely to make wider prediction intervals. Such superior forecasting ability of good academic performers may help explain why smart investors perform better in financial markets.

Keywords

  • Academic performance, forecasting errors, Prediction intervals, Overconfidence
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-51
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Volume20
Early online date27 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2018

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations