Academic performance and financial forecasting performance:A survey study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Vol. 20, 10.12.2018, p. 45-51.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Academic performance and financial forecasting performance:A survey study
AU - Zhu, Dan
AU - Hodgkinson, Lynn
AU - Wang, Qingwei
PY - 2018/12/10
Y1 - 2018/12/10
N2 - In a survey of forecasting stock prices over 13 months, we find better academic performance is significantly associated with smaller absolute forecasting errors, a lower propensity to be overconfident and narrower prediction intervals. The latter two findings are surprising as one would expect that less overconfident forecasters are more likely to make wider prediction intervals. Such superior forecasting ability of good academic performers may help explain why smart investors perform better in financial markets.
AB - In a survey of forecasting stock prices over 13 months, we find better academic performance is significantly associated with smaller absolute forecasting errors, a lower propensity to be overconfident and narrower prediction intervals. The latter two findings are surprising as one would expect that less overconfident forecasters are more likely to make wider prediction intervals. Such superior forecasting ability of good academic performers may help explain why smart investors perform better in financial markets.
KW - Academic performance, forecasting errors,
KW - Prediction intervals
KW - Overconfidence
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbef.2018.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jbef.2018.07.002
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 45
EP - 51
JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
SN - 2214-6350
ER -