Adapting deep learning models between regional markets
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.2023, p. 1483–1492.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting deep learning models between regional markets
AU - Tonkin, Isaac
AU - Gepp, Adrian
AU - Harris, Geoff
AU - Vanstone, Bruce
N1 - Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - This paper extends a series of deep learning models developed on US equity data to the Australian market. The model architectures are retrained, without structural modification, and tested on Australian data comparable with the original US data. Relative to the original US-based results, the retrained models are statistically less accurate at predicting next day returns. The models were also modified in the standard train/validate manner on the Australian data, and these modelsyielded significantly better predictive results on the holdout data. It was determined that the best-performing models were a CNN and LSTM, attaining highly significant Z-scores of 6.154 and 8.789, respectively. Due to the relative structural similarity across all models, the improvement is ascribed to regional influences within the respective training data sets.Such unique regional differences are consistent with views in the literature stating that deep learning models in computational finance that are developed and trained on a single market will always contain market-specific bias. Given this finding, future research into the development of deep learning models trained on global markets is recommended.
AB - This paper extends a series of deep learning models developed on US equity data to the Australian market. The model architectures are retrained, without structural modification, and tested on Australian data comparable with the original US data. Relative to the original US-based results, the retrained models are statistically less accurate at predicting next day returns. The models were also modified in the standard train/validate manner on the Australian data, and these modelsyielded significantly better predictive results on the holdout data. It was determined that the best-performing models were a CNN and LSTM, attaining highly significant Z-scores of 6.154 and 8.789, respectively. Due to the relative structural similarity across all models, the improvement is ascribed to regional influences within the respective training data sets.Such unique regional differences are consistent with views in the literature stating that deep learning models in computational finance that are developed and trained on a single market will always contain market-specific bias. Given this finding, future research into the development of deep learning models trained on global markets is recommended.
KW - Deep learing
KW - Machine learning
KW - Candlesticks
KW - Technical analysis
U2 - 10.1007/s00521-022-07805-1
DO - 10.1007/s00521-022-07805-1
M3 - Article
VL - 35
SP - 1483
EP - 1492
JO - Neural Computing and Applications
JF - Neural Computing and Applications
SN - 1433-3058
IS - 2
ER -