Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Michael P Kelly
    University of Cambridge
  • Jane Noyes
  • Robert L Kane
    University of Minnesota
  • Christine Chang
    AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice Center, Rockville, MD
  • Stacey Uhl
    ECRI Institute, Plymouth Meeting, PA
  • Karen A Robinson
    Johns Hopkins University
  • Stacey Springs
    Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI
  • Mary E Butler
    University of Minnesota
  • Jeanne-Marie Guise
    University of Oregon Health Sciences Center

BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multi-dimensional and dynamic nature.

RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in Paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Further it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.

DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straight-forward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

Keywords

  • Complex interventions, Evidence-Based Medicine, Review Literature as Topic, Systematic review, Qualitative Research, Research Design
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-18
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume90
Issue numberOctober
Early online date15 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations