An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction. / Laurent, X.; Ensslin, A.; Mari-Beffa, P.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance., Vol. 44, No. 1, 04.2016, p. 494-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Laurent, X, Ensslin, A & Mari-Beffa, P 2016, 'An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000155

APA

Laurent, X., Ensslin, A., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2016). An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance., 44(1), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000155

CBE

Laurent X, Ensslin A, Mari-Beffa P. 2016. An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 44(1):494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000155

MLA

Laurent, X., A. Ensslin, and P. Mari-Beffa. "An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016, 44(1). 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000155

VancouverVancouver

Laurent X, Ensslin A, Mari-Beffa P. An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016 Apr;44(1):494-507. Epub 2015 Nov 2. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000155

Author

Laurent, X. ; Ensslin, A. ; Mari-Beffa, P. / An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 494-507.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding, but removes distraction

AU - Laurent, X.

AU - Ensslin, A.

AU - Mari-Beffa, P.

N1 - 'This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.'

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - There is some debate as to whether responding to objects in our environment improves episodic memory or doesn't impact it. Some authors claim that actively encoding objects improves their representation in episodic memory. Conversely, episodic memory has also been shown to improve in passive conditions, suggesting that the action itself could interfere with the encoding process. This study looks at the impact of attention and action on episodic memory using a novel WWW task that includes information about object identity (What), spatial (Where) and temporal (When) properties. With this approach we studied the episodic memory of two types of object: Target, where attention or an action is defined, and Distractor, object to be ignored, following two selective states: active vs. passive selection. When targets were actively selected, we found no evidence of episodic memory enhancement compared to passive selection; but instead memory from irrelevant sources was suppressed. The pattern was replicated across a 2D static display and a more realistic 3D virtual environment. This selective attention effect on episodic memory was not observed on non-episodic measures, demonstrating a link between attention and the encoding of episodic experiences.

AB - There is some debate as to whether responding to objects in our environment improves episodic memory or doesn't impact it. Some authors claim that actively encoding objects improves their representation in episodic memory. Conversely, episodic memory has also been shown to improve in passive conditions, suggesting that the action itself could interfere with the encoding process. This study looks at the impact of attention and action on episodic memory using a novel WWW task that includes information about object identity (What), spatial (Where) and temporal (When) properties. With this approach we studied the episodic memory of two types of object: Target, where attention or an action is defined, and Distractor, object to be ignored, following two selective states: active vs. passive selection. When targets were actively selected, we found no evidence of episodic memory enhancement compared to passive selection; but instead memory from irrelevant sources was suppressed. The pattern was replicated across a 2D static display and a more realistic 3D virtual environment. This selective attention effect on episodic memory was not observed on non-episodic measures, demonstrating a link between attention and the encoding of episodic experiences.

U2 - 10.1037/xhp0000155

DO - 10.1037/xhp0000155

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 494

EP - 507

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 1

ER -