Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Jane Noyes
    School of Social Sciences, Bangor University
  • Andrew Booth
    University of Sheffield
  • Simon Lewin
    South African Medical Research Council, Capetown
  • Benedicte Carlsen
    Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway.
  • Claire Glenton
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Christopher J Colvin
    University of Cape Town
  • Ruth Garside
    University of Exeter Medical School
  • Meghan A Bohren
    World Health Organization, Geneva
  • Arash Rashidian
    Information, Evidence and Research Department, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Megan Wainwright
    Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway.
  • Özge Tunςalp
    University of Exeter Medical School
  • Jacqueline Chandler
    Cochrane, Cochrane Central Executive, London, UK.
  • Signe Flottorp
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Tomas Pantoja
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Joseph D Tucker
    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Heather Munthe-Kaas
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's relevance component.

METHODS: We developed the relevance component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual relevance component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application.

RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define relevance as the extent to which the body of data from the primary studies supporting a review finding is applicable to the context (perspective or population, phenomenon of interest, setting) specified in the review question. In this paper, we describe the relevance component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess relevance in the context of a review finding. This guidance outlines the information required to assess relevance, the steps that need to be taken to assess relevance and examples of relevance assessments.

CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of relevance in the context of the CERQual approach. Assessing the relevance component requires consideration of potentially important contextual factors at an early stage in the review process. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

Keywords

  • Journal Article
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4
JournalImplementation Science
Volume13
Issue numberSuppl 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations