Standard Standard

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. / Noyes, Jane; Booth, Andrew; Lewin, Simon et al.
In: Implementation Science, Vol. 13, No. Suppl 1, 25.01.2018, p. 4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Noyes, J, Booth, A, Lewin, S, Carlsen, B, Glenton, C, Colvin, CJ, Garside, R, Bohren, MA, Rashidian, A, Wainwright, M, Tunςalp, Ö, Chandler, J, Flottorp, S, Pantoja, T, Tucker, JD & Munthe-Kaas, H 2018, 'Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data', Implementation Science, vol. 13, no. Suppl 1, pp. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

APA

Noyes, J., Booth, A., Lewin, S., Carlsen, B., Glenton, C., Colvin, C. J., Garside, R., Bohren, M. A., Rashidian, A., Wainwright, M., Tunςalp, Ö., Chandler, J., Flottorp, S., Pantoja, T., Tucker, J. D., & Munthe-Kaas, H. (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implementation Science, 13(Suppl 1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

CBE

Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, Garside R, Bohren MA, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. 2018. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implementation Science. 13(Suppl 1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin CJ et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implementation Science. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

Author

Noyes, Jane ; Booth, Andrew ; Lewin, Simon et al. / Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6 : how to assess relevance of the data. In: Implementation Science. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. Suppl 1. pp. 4.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6

T2 - how to assess relevance of the data

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Booth, Andrew

AU - Lewin, Simon

AU - Carlsen, Benedicte

AU - Glenton, Claire

AU - Colvin, Christopher J

AU - Garside, Ruth

AU - Bohren, Meghan A

AU - Rashidian, Arash

AU - Wainwright, Megan

AU - Tunςalp, Özge

AU - Chandler, Jacqueline

AU - Flottorp, Signe

AU - Pantoja, Tomas

AU - Tucker, Joseph D

AU - Munthe-Kaas, Heather

PY - 2018/1/25

Y1 - 2018/1/25

N2 - BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's relevance component.METHODS: We developed the relevance component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual relevance component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application.RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define relevance as the extent to which the body of data from the primary studies supporting a review finding is applicable to the context (perspective or population, phenomenon of interest, setting) specified in the review question. In this paper, we describe the relevance component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess relevance in the context of a review finding. This guidance outlines the information required to assess relevance, the steps that need to be taken to assess relevance and examples of relevance assessments.CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of relevance in the context of the CERQual approach. Assessing the relevance component requires consideration of potentially important contextual factors at an early stage in the review process. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

AB - BACKGROUND: The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach has been developed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group. The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. CERQual includes four components for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from reviews of qualitative research (also referred to as qualitative evidence syntheses): (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data and (4) relevance. This paper is part of a series providing guidance on how to apply CERQual and focuses on CERQual's relevance component.METHODS: We developed the relevance component by searching the literature for definitions, gathering feedback from relevant research communities and developing consensus through project group meetings. We tested the CERQual relevance component within several qualitative evidence syntheses before agreeing on the current definition and principles for application.RESULTS: When applying CERQual, we define relevance as the extent to which the body of data from the primary studies supporting a review finding is applicable to the context (perspective or population, phenomenon of interest, setting) specified in the review question. In this paper, we describe the relevance component and its rationale and offer guidance on how to assess relevance in the context of a review finding. This guidance outlines the information required to assess relevance, the steps that need to be taken to assess relevance and examples of relevance assessments.CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides guidance for review authors and others on undertaking an assessment of relevance in the context of the CERQual approach. Assessing the relevance component requires consideration of potentially important contextual factors at an early stage in the review process. We expect the CERQual approach, and its individual components, to develop further as our experiences with the practical implementation of the approach increase.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

DO - 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 29384080

VL - 13

SP - 4

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - Suppl 1

ER -