Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Global Advances in Health and Medicine, Vol. 9, 2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
AU - Crane, Rebecca
AU - Koerbel, Lynn
AU - Sansom, Sophie
AU - Yiangou, Alison
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Inclusion of assessment of teaching competence in Mindfulness-Based Program (MBP) teacher training enables international benchmarking of standards, which in turn underpins the integrity of this emerging field and the potential to deliver effective, transformative interventions. However, there is a risk that the inclusion of competence assessment could lead to reductionism and undermining of the pedagogical features that make mindfulness-based teaching distinct. It can also make the costs of training prohibitive. The science underpinning the integrity of competence assessment is not yet robust enough to justify wide scale implementation, but when feasible, including the option for assessment enables trainees to engage in rigorous and effective training processes. When assessment is included, it is critically important that the process is held with awareness and sensitivity, and is implemented by experienced assessors with thoughtful governance. Navigating these issues involves balancing rigour with accessibility and pragmatism. This paper lays out some guidelines for good practice for MBP teaching assessment, and raises unresolved dilemmas and questions.
AB - Inclusion of assessment of teaching competence in Mindfulness-Based Program (MBP) teacher training enables international benchmarking of standards, which in turn underpins the integrity of this emerging field and the potential to deliver effective, transformative interventions. However, there is a risk that the inclusion of competence assessment could lead to reductionism and undermining of the pedagogical features that make mindfulness-based teaching distinct. It can also make the costs of training prohibitive. The science underpinning the integrity of competence assessment is not yet robust enough to justify wide scale implementation, but when feasible, including the option for assessment enables trainees to engage in rigorous and effective training processes. When assessment is included, it is critically important that the process is held with awareness and sensitivity, and is implemented by experienced assessors with thoughtful governance. Navigating these issues involves balancing rigour with accessibility and pragmatism. This paper lays out some guidelines for good practice for MBP teaching assessment, and raises unresolved dilemmas and questions.
KW - assessment
KW - fidelity
KW - competence
KW - MBI:TAC
KW - Mindfulness-based programs
KW - mindfulness-based interventions
KW - teaching assessment criteria
U2 - 10.1177%2F2164956120973627
DO - 10.1177%2F2164956120973627
M3 - Article
VL - 9
JO - Global Advances in Health and Medicine
JF - Global Advances in Health and Medicine
SN - 2164-9561
ER -