Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Simon Davies
    Keele University
  • David Coyle
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
  • Elizabeth J. Lindley
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
  • David Keane
    University of Galway
  • John Belcher
    Keele University
  • Fergus Caskey
    University of Bristol
  • Indranil Dasgupta
    University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Andrew Davenport
    Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust
  • Ken Farrington
    East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
  • Sandip Mitra
    Central Manchester University Hospitals
  • Paula Ormandy
    University of Salford
  • Martin Wilkie
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
  • Jamie Macdonald
  • Mandana Zanganeh
    University of Warwick
  • Lazaros Andronis
    University of Birmingham
  • Ivonne Solis-Trapala
    Keele University
  • Julius Sim
    Keele University
Avoiding excessive dialysis-associated volume depletion may help preserve residual kidney function (RKF). To establish whether knowledge of the estimated normally hydrated weight from bioimpedance measurements (BI-NHW) when setting the post-hemodialysis target weight (TW) might mitigate rate of loss of RKF, we undertook an open label, randomized controlled trial in incident patients receiving HD, with clinicians and patients blinded to bioimpedance readings in controls. A total of 439 patients with over 500 ml urine/day or residual GFR exceeding 3 ml/min/1.73m2 were recruited from 34 United Kingdom centers and randomized 1:1, stratified by center. Fluid assessments were made for up to 24 months using a standardized proforma in both groups, supplemented by availability of BI-NHW in the intervention group. Primary outcome was time to anuria, analyzed using competing-risk survival models adjusted for baseline characteristics, by intention to treat. Secondary outcomes included rate of RKF decline (mean urea and creatinine clearance), blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes. There were no group differences in cause-specific hazard rates of anuria (0.751; 95% confidence interval (0.459, 1.229)) or sub-distribution hazard rates (0.742 (0.453, 1.215)). RKF decline was markedly slower than anticipated, pooled linear rates in year 1: –0.178 (–0.196, –0.159)), year 2: –0.061 (–0.086, –0.036)) ml/min/1.73m2/month. Blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes did not differ by group. The mean difference agreement between TW and BI-NHW was similar for both groups, Bioimpedance: –0.04 kg; Control: –0.25 kg. Thus, use of a standardized clinical protocol for fluid assessment when setting TW is associated with excellent preservation of RKF. Hence, bioimpedance measurements are not necessary to achieve this.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-598
JournalKidney International
Volume104
Issue number3
Early online date30 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations