Business model and ESG pillars: The impacts on banking default risk
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 91, No. 1, 102978, 01.01.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Business model and ESG pillars: The impacts on banking default risk
AU - Palmieri, Egidio
AU - Ferilli, Greta
AU - Altunbas, Yener
AU - Stefanelli, Valeria
AU - Geretto, Enrico Fioravante
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - The recent banks’ failures have highlighted the importance of improving banking sector supervision, emphasizing the need to adopt a holistic approach to risk assessment based on an evaluation of a bank's business model (BBM) that combines financial (e.g., bank’s balance data) and non-financial information (e.g., bank’s ESG performance). In this study, we explore the joint effect of BBM and their environmental (ENV), social (SOC), and governance (GOV) pillars performance on banks’ riskiness profile. The study uses a sample of 639 EU banks from 2013 to 2022 and applied a random effects model. Our findings suggest wholesale and retail banks could mitigate default risk, enhancing their ENV pillar performance. Differently, investment banks are encouraged to improve their governance best practices and structure to take advantage in terms of riskiness reduction. These results remain consistent after a series ofrobustness tests, including the 2SLS model and the Arellano coefficient estimation. Our paper offers practical implications for banking supervisory authorities and practitioners, encouraging to adopt a diversified ESG investment strategy according to bank-specific business models.
AB - The recent banks’ failures have highlighted the importance of improving banking sector supervision, emphasizing the need to adopt a holistic approach to risk assessment based on an evaluation of a bank's business model (BBM) that combines financial (e.g., bank’s balance data) and non-financial information (e.g., bank’s ESG performance). In this study, we explore the joint effect of BBM and their environmental (ENV), social (SOC), and governance (GOV) pillars performance on banks’ riskiness profile. The study uses a sample of 639 EU banks from 2013 to 2022 and applied a random effects model. Our findings suggest wholesale and retail banks could mitigate default risk, enhancing their ENV pillar performance. Differently, investment banks are encouraged to improve their governance best practices and structure to take advantage in terms of riskiness reduction. These results remain consistent after a series ofrobustness tests, including the 2SLS model and the Arellano coefficient estimation. Our paper offers practical implications for banking supervisory authorities and practitioners, encouraging to adopt a diversified ESG investment strategy according to bank-specific business models.
U2 - 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102978
DO - 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102978
M3 - Article
VL - 91
JO - International Review of Financial Analysis
JF - International Review of Financial Analysis
SN - 1057-5219
IS - 1
M1 - 102978
ER -