Centralised or Decentralised Banking Supervision? Evidence from European Banks
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 110, 102264, 02.2021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Centralised or Decentralised Banking Supervision? Evidence from European Banks
AU - Avignone, Giuseppe
AU - Altunbas, Yener
AU - Polizzi, Salvatore
AU - Reghezza, Alessio
N1 - 18 months embargo
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - This paper analyses the impact of the Banking Union on European bank credit risk. Specifically, we investigate the effect that the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism has had on the credit risk of the banks it supervises in comparison to financial institutions that are still supervised by National Supervisory Authorities. We analyse a sample of 746 European banks over the period 2011-2018, by means of a difference-in-differences methodology. We provide empirical evidence that Single Supervisory Mechanism supervised banks reduced credit risk exposure compared to banks supervised by National Supervisory Authorities, suggesting that the Banking Union has successfully reduced the riskiness of the European banking sector. Our results passed a battery of robustness tests that support the reliability of our analysis. Our contribution sheds light on the benefits of centralised versus decentralised supervision, on the effectiveness of the current supervisory system in Europe, and on its impact on European bank risk.
AB - This paper analyses the impact of the Banking Union on European bank credit risk. Specifically, we investigate the effect that the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism has had on the credit risk of the banks it supervises in comparison to financial institutions that are still supervised by National Supervisory Authorities. We analyse a sample of 746 European banks over the period 2011-2018, by means of a difference-in-differences methodology. We provide empirical evidence that Single Supervisory Mechanism supervised banks reduced credit risk exposure compared to banks supervised by National Supervisory Authorities, suggesting that the Banking Union has successfully reduced the riskiness of the European banking sector. Our results passed a battery of robustness tests that support the reliability of our analysis. Our contribution sheds light on the benefits of centralised versus decentralised supervision, on the effectiveness of the current supervisory system in Europe, and on its impact on European bank risk.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102264
DO - 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102264
M3 - Article
VL - 110
JO - Journal of International Money and Finance
JF - Journal of International Money and Finance
SN - 0261-5606
M1 - 102264
ER -