Challenges for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in a Devolved UK: A Case Study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol. 74, No. 1, 27.07.2023, p. 123-154.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in a Devolved UK: A Case Study
AU - Roberts, Hayley
AU - Pritchard, Huw
N1 - 1 year embargo upon publication
PY - 2023/7/27
Y1 - 2023/7/27
N2 - This article is one of the first of its kind to undertake empirical research into the engagement of a devolved government in a UN human rights treaty monitoring process. There is a lack of studies on this topic, even though the UK’s devolved nations have legislative competence and responsibilities to implement many obligations arising from several international human rights treaties, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The article provides a case study to evaluate and compare how regional governments are accommodated in the treaty body system so that future monitoring processes accurately reflect the differences in implementation of UN treaties, or lack thereof, across different regions within the State. The potential impact of ‘under-representative’ State reporting is also examined. The article highlights that State Reports and the monitoring process should ensure accurate and reliable information on implementation in each nation of the UK and, more specifically, should ensure that the State delegation is composed of a balanced number of representatives from each nation, that delegation responses to Committee questions clearly indicate whether the reply relates to law, policy and practice in the UK as a whole or solely to a specific nation, and that delegation representatives have a full understanding of the division of responsibilities between the UK Government and the devolved governments.
AB - This article is one of the first of its kind to undertake empirical research into the engagement of a devolved government in a UN human rights treaty monitoring process. There is a lack of studies on this topic, even though the UK’s devolved nations have legislative competence and responsibilities to implement many obligations arising from several international human rights treaties, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The article provides a case study to evaluate and compare how regional governments are accommodated in the treaty body system so that future monitoring processes accurately reflect the differences in implementation of UN treaties, or lack thereof, across different regions within the State. The potential impact of ‘under-representative’ State reporting is also examined. The article highlights that State Reports and the monitoring process should ensure accurate and reliable information on implementation in each nation of the UK and, more specifically, should ensure that the State delegation is composed of a balanced number of representatives from each nation, that delegation responses to Committee questions clearly indicate whether the reply relates to law, policy and practice in the UK as a whole or solely to a specific nation, and that delegation representatives have a full understanding of the division of responsibilities between the UK Government and the devolved governments.
KW - Devolution
KW - International law
KW - Human rights
KW - Treaty monitoring
U2 - 10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1020
DO - 10.53386/nilq.v74i1.1020
M3 - Article
VL - 74
SP - 123
EP - 154
JO - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
JF - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -