Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior. / Williams, Ceridwen; Rauwolf, Paul; Boulter, Matt et al.
In: Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 6, 449, 27.05.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Williams C, Rauwolf P, Boulter M, Parkinson JA. Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior. Behavioral Sciences. 2024 May 27;14(6):449. Epub 2024 May 27. doi: 10.3390/bs14060449

Author

Williams, Ceridwen ; Rauwolf, Paul ; Boulter, Matt et al. / Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior. In: Behavioral Sciences. 2024 ; Vol. 14, No. 6.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior

AU - Williams, Ceridwen

AU - Rauwolf, Paul

AU - Boulter, Matt

AU - Parkinson, John A.

PY - 2024/5/27

Y1 - 2024/5/27

N2 - Pandemics, and other risk-related contexts, require dynamic changes in behavior as situations develop. Human behavior is influenced by both explicit (cognitive) and implicit (intuitive) factors. In this study, we used psychological distance as a lens to understand what influences our decision-making with regard to risk in the context of COVID-19. This study was based on the rationale that our relational needs are more concrete to us than the risk of the virus. First, we explored the impact of social–psychological distance on participants’ risk perceptions and behavioral willingness. As hypothesized, we found that close social relationships of agents promoted willingness to engage in risky behavior. In the second phase, we tested an intervention designed to increase the concreteness of information about virus transmission as a mechanism to mitigate the bias of social influence. We found that the concreteness intervention resulted in significantly reduced willingness to engage in risky behavior. As such, communications aimed at changing the behavior of citizens during times of increased risk or danger should consider conceptually concrete messaging when communicating complex risk, and hence may provide a valuable tool in promoting health-related behavior.

AB - Pandemics, and other risk-related contexts, require dynamic changes in behavior as situations develop. Human behavior is influenced by both explicit (cognitive) and implicit (intuitive) factors. In this study, we used psychological distance as a lens to understand what influences our decision-making with regard to risk in the context of COVID-19. This study was based on the rationale that our relational needs are more concrete to us than the risk of the virus. First, we explored the impact of social–psychological distance on participants’ risk perceptions and behavioral willingness. As hypothesized, we found that close social relationships of agents promoted willingness to engage in risky behavior. In the second phase, we tested an intervention designed to increase the concreteness of information about virus transmission as a mechanism to mitigate the bias of social influence. We found that the concreteness intervention resulted in significantly reduced willingness to engage in risky behavior. As such, communications aimed at changing the behavior of citizens during times of increased risk or danger should consider conceptually concrete messaging when communicating complex risk, and hence may provide a valuable tool in promoting health-related behavior.

KW - psychological distance

KW - construal level

KW - behavior change

KW - COVID-19

U2 - 10.3390/bs14060449

DO - 10.3390/bs14060449

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - Behavioral Sciences

JF - Behavioral Sciences

IS - 6

M1 - 449

ER -