Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 125, 05.09.2017, p. 260-267.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy
AU - Togneri, Michael
AU - Jones, Dale
AU - Neill, Simon
AU - Lewis, Matthew
AU - Ward, Sophie
AU - Piano, Marco
AU - Masters, Ian
PY - 2017/9/5
Y1 - 2017/9/5
N2 - Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity.
AB - Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity.
KW - ADCP
KW - Turbulence
KW - Tidal energy
KW - Ocean current
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170
M3 - Article
VL - 125
SP - 260
EP - 267
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
SN - 1876-6102
ER -