Effects of cooperation and competition on performance, emotion and effort: Goal and means interdependence
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 2, 04.2022, p. 86-93.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of cooperation and competition on performance, emotion and effort: Goal and means interdependence
AU - Ring, Christopher
AU - Kavussanu, Maria
AU - Cooke, Andrew
N1 - No embargo upon publication
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Social interdependence theory proposes that task structure influences performance via social interaction. Using this framework, we examined sport performance. Fifty-six males performed a basketball task under four conditions: as an individual (individual, perform your best) and as a member of a team of two (cooperation, where teammates sought to better their individual performance; means independent competition, where two teams competed sequentially to outperform the other team; means interdependent competition, where two teams competed simultaneously to outperform the other team). Task performance (points) was better during means independent competition than other conditions. Anxiety and effort peaked during the competitions and enjoyment was greater during competition and cooperation than during the individual condition. Emotions, effort, and actions are discussed as explanations for the performance effects. Social interdependence theory provides a valuableframework to understand emotion, motivation, and performance. Team competition can be used to promote effort and enhance performance in sport.
AB - Social interdependence theory proposes that task structure influences performance via social interaction. Using this framework, we examined sport performance. Fifty-six males performed a basketball task under four conditions: as an individual (individual, perform your best) and as a member of a team of two (cooperation, where teammates sought to better their individual performance; means independent competition, where two teams competed sequentially to outperform the other team; means interdependent competition, where two teams competed simultaneously to outperform the other team). Task performance (points) was better during means independent competition than other conditions. Anxiety and effort peaked during the competitions and enjoyment was greater during competition and cooperation than during the individual condition. Emotions, effort, and actions are discussed as explanations for the performance effects. Social interdependence theory provides a valuableframework to understand emotion, motivation, and performance. Team competition can be used to promote effort and enhance performance in sport.
U2 - 10.1123/jsep.2020-0357
DO - 10.1123/jsep.2020-0357
M3 - Article
VL - 44
SP - 86
EP - 93
JO - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
JF - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
SN - 0895-2779
IS - 2
ER -