Standard Standard

Empathic media and advertising: Industry, policy, legal and citizen perspectives (the case for intimacy). / McStay, Andrew.
In: Big Data and Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, 23.11.2016, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

McStay A. Empathic media and advertising: Industry, policy, legal and citizen perspectives (the case for intimacy). Big Data and Society. 2016 Nov 23;3(2):1-11. Epub 2016 Nov 1. doi: 10.1177/2053951716666868

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empathic media and advertising

T2 - Industry, policy, legal and citizen perspectives (the case for intimacy)

AU - McStay, Andrew

PY - 2016/11/23

Y1 - 2016/11/23

N2 - Drawing on interviews with people from the advertising and technology industry, legal experts and policy makers, this paper assesses the rise of emotion detection in digital out-of-home advertising, a practice that often involves facial coding of emotional expressions in public spaces. Having briefly outlined how bodies contribute to targeting processes and the optimisation of the ads themselves, it progresses to detail industrial perspectives, intentions and attitudes to data ethics. Although the paper explores possibilities of this sector, it pays careful attention to existing practices that claim not to use personal data. Centrally, it argues that scholars and regulators need to pay attention to the principle of intimacy. This is developed to counter weaknesses in privacy that is typically based on identification. Having defined technologies, use cases, industrial perspectives, legal views and arguments about jurisprudence, the paper discusses this ensemble of perspectives in light of a nationwide survey about how UK citizens feel about the potential for emotion detection in out-of-home advertising.

AB - Drawing on interviews with people from the advertising and technology industry, legal experts and policy makers, this paper assesses the rise of emotion detection in digital out-of-home advertising, a practice that often involves facial coding of emotional expressions in public spaces. Having briefly outlined how bodies contribute to targeting processes and the optimisation of the ads themselves, it progresses to detail industrial perspectives, intentions and attitudes to data ethics. Although the paper explores possibilities of this sector, it pays careful attention to existing practices that claim not to use personal data. Centrally, it argues that scholars and regulators need to pay attention to the principle of intimacy. This is developed to counter weaknesses in privacy that is typically based on identification. Having defined technologies, use cases, industrial perspectives, legal views and arguments about jurisprudence, the paper discusses this ensemble of perspectives in light of a nationwide survey about how UK citizens feel about the potential for emotion detection in out-of-home advertising.

KW - Advertising, biometric, emotion, policy, public, tracking

U2 - 10.1177/2053951716666868

DO - 10.1177/2053951716666868

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Big Data and Society

JF - Big Data and Society

SN - 2053-9517

IS - 2

ER -