TY - JOUR

T1 - Extinction and ecosystem function debt across dispersal rate and behavior in a heterogeneous metacommunity model

T2 - Extinction and ecosystem function debt

AU - Ai, Dexiecuo

AU - Ostling, Annette

AU - Ellwood, M. D. F.

PY - 2024/10/9

Y1 - 2024/10/9

N2 - Aim: Habitat destruction causes “extinction debt” and is also thought to produce ecosystem function debt, but theory of their magnitude and nature is limited. Heterogeneous landscapes are fundamental to the maintenance of species richness and ecosystem function, whilst directed or undirected dispersal behavior, such as dispersal of seeds by animals or by the wind, is also important, especially after habitat destruction. We therefore consider extinction and ecosystem function debt under different dispersal rates and behaviors in heterogeneous landscapes. Methods: We use a classic heterogeneous metacommunity model to capture the dynamics of competing species in local patches linked by dispersal and varying in environmental conditions. We remove one patch at a time, and measure extinction debt and ecosystem function debt by the number / proportion of delayed extinctions and the amount of biomass change, respectively.Results: We reveal three species extinction regimes as dispersal increases: 1. species most adapted to the removed habitat are most at risk; 2. similarly adapted species are also at risk; 3. patch removal shifts competitive balance among the few species coexisting at high dispersal, where competition is strong. We find surprisingly that destruction of habitat can hasten the extinction of those species best adapted to harsh environments, and that the proportion of diversity at risk from extinction actually increases with dispersal because competition is intense there. Finally, there can be a small ecosystem credit, but extinction debt, when dispersers reroute to potentially more favorable remaining habitats (directed dispersal), especially when harsh environments are removed. However, ecosystem debt occurs and can be large under undirected dispersal. Main conclusions: The magnitude and nature of extinction and ecosystem function debts depend on species dispersal rates and behaviors, as well as the environmental conditions of the disturbed habitats. Conservation actions will be more successful if they consider these factors.

AB - Aim: Habitat destruction causes “extinction debt” and is also thought to produce ecosystem function debt, but theory of their magnitude and nature is limited. Heterogeneous landscapes are fundamental to the maintenance of species richness and ecosystem function, whilst directed or undirected dispersal behavior, such as dispersal of seeds by animals or by the wind, is also important, especially after habitat destruction. We therefore consider extinction and ecosystem function debt under different dispersal rates and behaviors in heterogeneous landscapes. Methods: We use a classic heterogeneous metacommunity model to capture the dynamics of competing species in local patches linked by dispersal and varying in environmental conditions. We remove one patch at a time, and measure extinction debt and ecosystem function debt by the number / proportion of delayed extinctions and the amount of biomass change, respectively.Results: We reveal three species extinction regimes as dispersal increases: 1. species most adapted to the removed habitat are most at risk; 2. similarly adapted species are also at risk; 3. patch removal shifts competitive balance among the few species coexisting at high dispersal, where competition is strong. We find surprisingly that destruction of habitat can hasten the extinction of those species best adapted to harsh environments, and that the proportion of diversity at risk from extinction actually increases with dispersal because competition is intense there. Finally, there can be a small ecosystem credit, but extinction debt, when dispersers reroute to potentially more favorable remaining habitats (directed dispersal), especially when harsh environments are removed. However, ecosystem debt occurs and can be large under undirected dispersal. Main conclusions: The magnitude and nature of extinction and ecosystem function debts depend on species dispersal rates and behaviors, as well as the environmental conditions of the disturbed habitats. Conservation actions will be more successful if they consider these factors.

KW - habitat loss, directed/undirected dispersal, extinction regimes, harsh/benign environment, resource consumption, species conservation

M3 - Article

JO - Diversity and Distributions

JF - Diversity and Distributions

SN - 1472-4642

ER -