Standard Standard

'Families remembering food: Reusing secondary data.' Working paper. / Jackson, P.; Smith, G.; Olive, Sarah Elizabeth.
2007.

Research output: Other contribution

HarvardHarvard

APA

Jackson, P., Smith, G., & Olive, S. E. (2007). 'Families remembering food: Reusing secondary data.' Working paper.

CBE

MLA

Jackson, P., G. Smith and Sarah Elizabeth Olive, 'Families remembering food: Reusing secondary data.' Working paper., 2007.

VancouverVancouver

Author

Jackson, P. ; Smith, G. ; Olive, Sarah Elizabeth. / 'Families remembering food: Reusing secondary data.' Working paper. 2007.

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - 'Families remembering food: Reusing secondary data.' Working paper.

AU - Jackson, P.

AU - Smith, G.

AU - Olive, Sarah Elizabeth

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper examines the reuse of secondary data from three oral history archives in a current project on ‘Families Remembering Food’. The characteristics of the three archives (The Edwardians, 100 Families and the Millennium Memory Bank) are outlined paying particular attention to how, when and why the original data were collected. The challenges and opportunities of reusing these data are explored under three headings: practicalities, epistemologies and ethics. The paper concludes that the three archives have rich potential for reuse provided that they are adequately (re)contextualised and that the dialogical nature of life history research is sufficiently understood. The paper contributes to recent debates about the reflexive nature of qualitative analysis in general and the reuse of secondary data in particular.

AB - This paper examines the reuse of secondary data from three oral history archives in a current project on ‘Families Remembering Food’. The characteristics of the three archives (The Edwardians, 100 Families and the Millennium Memory Bank) are outlined paying particular attention to how, when and why the original data were collected. The challenges and opportunities of reusing these data are explored under three headings: practicalities, epistemologies and ethics. The paper concludes that the three archives have rich potential for reuse provided that they are adequately (re)contextualised and that the dialogical nature of life history research is sufficiently understood. The paper contributes to recent debates about the reflexive nature of qualitative analysis in general and the reuse of secondary data in particular.

M3 - Other contribution

ER -