Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Ingrid Toews
    University of Freiburg
  • Andrew Booth
    University of Sheffield
  • Rigmor C. Berg
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Simon Lewin
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Claire Glenton
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Heather M. Munthe-Kaas
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Jane Noyes
  • Sara Schroter
    BMJ London
  • Joerg M. Meerpohl
    Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris

OBJECTIVES: To conceptualise and discuss dissemination bias in qualitative research.

RESULTS: It is likely that the mechanisms leading to dissemination bias in quantitative research, including time lag, language, gray literature, and truncation bias also contribute to dissemination bias in qualitative research. These conceptual considerations have informed the development of a research agenda.

CONCLUSION: Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research is needed, including the extent of non-dissemination and related dissemination bias, and how to assess dissemination bias within qualitative evidence syntheses. We also need to consider the mechanisms through which dissemination bias in qualitative research could occur to explore approaches for reducing it.

Keywords

  • Journal Article
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-139
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume88
Issue numberAugust
Early online date20 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations