Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 88, No. August, 08.2017, p. 133-139.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses
AU - Toews, Ingrid
AU - Booth, Andrew
AU - Berg, Rigmor C.
AU - Lewin, Simon
AU - Glenton, Claire
AU - Munthe-Kaas, Heather M.
AU - Noyes, Jane
AU - Schroter, Sara
AU - Meerpohl, Joerg M.
N1 - This work was supported in part by funding from the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (www.who.int/alliancehpsr/en/) (Grant number: SPHQ15-APW-1510), WHO, Norad (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation: www.norad.no), and the Research Council of Norway (www.forskningsradet.no) (Grant number: 237757/H10). S.L. is supported by funding from the South African Medical Research Council (www.mrc.ac.za). Dear Marjan, Attached is the pre-print. I checked with the lead author that this is the final submitted version (which it is) – BUT importantly – the journal Editor then asked for the title to be changed from: Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: conceptual considerations To Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence synthesis. The team did not submit another version of the preprint and the title was changed by the publisher at the proof stage. Hope this helps explain the title anomaly.
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To conceptualise and discuss dissemination bias in qualitative research.RESULTS: It is likely that the mechanisms leading to dissemination bias in quantitative research, including time lag, language, gray literature, and truncation bias also contribute to dissemination bias in qualitative research. These conceptual considerations have informed the development of a research agenda.CONCLUSION: Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research is needed, including the extent of non-dissemination and related dissemination bias, and how to assess dissemination bias within qualitative evidence syntheses. We also need to consider the mechanisms through which dissemination bias in qualitative research could occur to explore approaches for reducing it.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To conceptualise and discuss dissemination bias in qualitative research.RESULTS: It is likely that the mechanisms leading to dissemination bias in quantitative research, including time lag, language, gray literature, and truncation bias also contribute to dissemination bias in qualitative research. These conceptual considerations have informed the development of a research agenda.CONCLUSION: Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research is needed, including the extent of non-dissemination and related dissemination bias, and how to assess dissemination bias within qualitative evidence syntheses. We also need to consider the mechanisms through which dissemination bias in qualitative research could occur to explore approaches for reducing it.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 28433676
VL - 88
SP - 133
EP - 139
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
SN - 0895-4356
IS - August
ER -