Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Amrit Dencer-Brown
    Edinburgh Napier University
  • Robyn Shilland
    Edinburgh Napier University
  • Daniel A. Friess
    National University of Singapore
  • Dorothee Herr
    Global Marine and Polar Program, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
  • Lisa Benson
    Centre for the Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas)
  • Nicholas Berry
    Landscapes and Livelihoods Group
  • Miguel Cifuentes-Jara
    Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE)
  • Patrick Colas
    Conservation Finance Africa Field Division
  • Ellyn Damayanti
    IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Elisa Lopez Garcia
    CINVESTAV
  • Marina Gavaldao
    Ubá Sustainability Institute, France
  • Gabriel Grimsditch
    United Nations Environment Programme
  • Adam P. Hejnowicz
    Newcastle University
  • Jennifer Howard
    Blue Carbon Program, Arlington, USA
  • Sheikh Tawhidul Islam
    Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh
  • Hilary Kennedy
  • Rahma Rashid Kivugo
    Mikoko Pamoja Community Base Organization, Kenya
  • Joseph K.S. Lang'at
    Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Mombasa
  • Catherine E. Lovelock
    University of Queensland
  • Ruth Malleson
    University College London
  • Peter I. Macreadie
    Deakin University, Victoria
  • Rosalia Andrade-Medina
    CINVESTAV
  • Ahmed Mohamed
    United Nations Environment Programme
  • Emily Pidgeon
    Conservation International, Arlington, USA
  • Jorge Ramos
    Charles Sturt University
  • Minerva Rosette
    CINVESTAV
  • Mwanarusi Mwafrica Salim
    Vanga Blue Forest Community Based Organization, Kenya
  • Eva Schoof
    Plan Vivo Foundation, Edinburgh
  • Byomkesh Talukder
    York University, Toronto
  • Tara Thomas
    Conservation International
  • Mathew A. Vanderklift
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
  • Mark Huxham
    Edinburgh Napier University
Blue Carbon Ecosystems (BCEs) help mitigate and adapt to climate change but their integration into policy, such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), remains underdeveloped. Most BCE conservation requires community engagement, hence community-scale projects must be nested within the implementation of NDCs without compromising livelihoods or social justice. Thirty-three experts, drawn from academia, project development and policy, each developed ten key questions for consideration on how to achieve this. These questions were distilled into ten themes, ranked in order of importance, giving three broad categories of people, policy & finance, and science & technology. Critical considerations for success include the need for genuine participation by communities, inclusive project governance, integration of local work into national policies and practices, sustaining livelihoods and income (for example through the voluntary carbon market and/or national Payment for Ecosystem Services and other types of financial compensation schemes) and simplification of carbon accounting and verification methodologies to lower barriers to entry.

Keywords

  • Blue carbon, Conservation, Local livelihoods, NDCs, Nature-based solutions, Perspective, Sustainability
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1978-1993
Number of pages16
JournalAMBIO
Volume51
Issue number9
Early online date3 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2022

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations