Integrating blue: How do we make nationally determined contributions work for both blue carbon and local coastal communities?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: AMBIO, Vol. 51, No. 9, 01.09.2022, p. 1978-1993.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating blue: How do we make nationally determined contributions work for both blue carbon and local coastal communities?
AU - Dencer-Brown, Amrit
AU - Shilland, Robyn
AU - Friess, Daniel A.
AU - Herr, Dorothee
AU - Benson, Lisa
AU - Berry, Nicholas
AU - Cifuentes-Jara, Miguel
AU - Colas, Patrick
AU - Damayanti, Ellyn
AU - Lopez Garcia, Elisa
AU - Gavaldao, Marina
AU - Grimsditch, Gabriel
AU - Hejnowicz, Adam P.
AU - Howard, Jennifer
AU - Islam, Sheikh Tawhidul
AU - Kennedy, Hilary
AU - Kivugo, Rahma Rashid
AU - Lang'at, Joseph K.S.
AU - Lovelock, Catherine E.
AU - Malleson, Ruth
AU - Macreadie, Peter I.
AU - Andrade-Medina, Rosalia
AU - Mohamed, Ahmed
AU - Pidgeon, Emily
AU - Ramos, Jorge
AU - Rosette, Minerva
AU - Salim, Mwanarusi Mwafrica
AU - Schoof, Eva
AU - Talukder, Byomkesh
AU - Thomas, Tara
AU - Vanderklift, Mathew A.
AU - Huxham, Mark
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Blue Carbon Ecosystems (BCEs) help mitigate and adapt to climate change but their integration into policy, such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), remains underdeveloped. Most BCE conservation requires community engagement, hence community-scale projects must be nested within the implementation of NDCs without compromising livelihoods or social justice. Thirty-three experts, drawn from academia, project development and policy, each developed ten key questions for consideration on how to achieve this. These questions were distilled into ten themes, ranked in order of importance, giving three broad categories of people, policy & finance, and science & technology. Critical considerations for success include the need for genuine participation by communities, inclusive project governance, integration of local work into national policies and practices, sustaining livelihoods and income (for example through the voluntary carbon market and/or national Payment for Ecosystem Services and other types of financial compensation schemes) and simplification of carbon accounting and verification methodologies to lower barriers to entry.
AB - Blue Carbon Ecosystems (BCEs) help mitigate and adapt to climate change but their integration into policy, such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), remains underdeveloped. Most BCE conservation requires community engagement, hence community-scale projects must be nested within the implementation of NDCs without compromising livelihoods or social justice. Thirty-three experts, drawn from academia, project development and policy, each developed ten key questions for consideration on how to achieve this. These questions were distilled into ten themes, ranked in order of importance, giving three broad categories of people, policy & finance, and science & technology. Critical considerations for success include the need for genuine participation by communities, inclusive project governance, integration of local work into national policies and practices, sustaining livelihoods and income (for example through the voluntary carbon market and/or national Payment for Ecosystem Services and other types of financial compensation schemes) and simplification of carbon accounting and verification methodologies to lower barriers to entry.
KW - Blue carbon
KW - Conservation
KW - Local livelihoods
KW - NDCs
KW - Nature-based solutions
KW - Perspective
KW - Sustainability
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-022-01723-1
DO - 10.1007/s13280-022-01723-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 35503201
VL - 51
SP - 1978
EP - 1993
JO - AMBIO
JF - AMBIO
SN - 0044-7447
IS - 9
ER -