Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms. / Noponen, M.R.; Haggar, J.P.; Edwards-Jones, G. et al.
In: Agricultural Systems, Vol. 119, 01.07.2013, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Noponen, MR, Haggar, JP, Edwards-Jones, G & Healey, JR 2013, 'Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms', Agricultural Systems, vol. 119, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.006

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Noponen MR, Haggar JP, Edwards-Jones G, Healey JR. Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms. Agricultural Systems. 2013 Jul 1;119:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.006

Author

Noponen, M.R. ; Haggar, J.P. ; Edwards-Jones, G. et al. / Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms. In: Agricultural Systems. 2013 ; Vol. 119. pp. 1-9.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensification of coffee systems can increase the effectiveness of REDD mechanisms

AU - Noponen, M.R.

AU - Haggar, J.P.

AU - Edwards-Jones, G.

AU - Healey, J.R.

N1 - Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - In agricultural production systems with shade trees, such as coffee, the increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from production intensification can be compensated for, or even outweighed, by the increase in carbon sequestration into above-ground and below-ground tree biomass. We use data from a long-term coffee agroforestry experiment in Costa Rica to evaluate the trade-offs between intensification, profitability and net greenhouse gas emissions through two scenarios. First, by assessing the GHG emissions associated with conversion from shaded to more profitable full-sun (un-shaded) systems, we calculate the break-even carbon price which would need to be paid to offset the opportunity cost of not converting. The price per tCO2e of emissions reduction required to compensate for the coffee production revenue foregone varies widely from 9.3 to 196.3 US$ amongst different shaded systems. Second, as an alternative to intensification, production area can be extended onto currently forested land. We estimate this land-use change required to compensate for the shortfall in profitability from retaining lower intensity coffee production systems. For four of the five shade types tested, this land-use change causes additional GHG emissions >5 tCO2e ha−1 yr−1 resulting in net emissions >8 tCO2e ha−1 yr−1 for the whole system. We conclude that instead, by intensifying production, mechanisms similar to REDD that are based on reducing emissions through avoided land-use change (REAL) could play a major role in increasing the climate change mitigation success of agroforestry systems at the same time as aiding REDD through reducing pressure for further forest conversion to agriculture.

AB - In agricultural production systems with shade trees, such as coffee, the increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from production intensification can be compensated for, or even outweighed, by the increase in carbon sequestration into above-ground and below-ground tree biomass. We use data from a long-term coffee agroforestry experiment in Costa Rica to evaluate the trade-offs between intensification, profitability and net greenhouse gas emissions through two scenarios. First, by assessing the GHG emissions associated with conversion from shaded to more profitable full-sun (un-shaded) systems, we calculate the break-even carbon price which would need to be paid to offset the opportunity cost of not converting. The price per tCO2e of emissions reduction required to compensate for the coffee production revenue foregone varies widely from 9.3 to 196.3 US$ amongst different shaded systems. Second, as an alternative to intensification, production area can be extended onto currently forested land. We estimate this land-use change required to compensate for the shortfall in profitability from retaining lower intensity coffee production systems. For four of the five shade types tested, this land-use change causes additional GHG emissions >5 tCO2e ha−1 yr−1 resulting in net emissions >8 tCO2e ha−1 yr−1 for the whole system. We conclude that instead, by intensifying production, mechanisms similar to REDD that are based on reducing emissions through avoided land-use change (REAL) could play a major role in increasing the climate change mitigation success of agroforestry systems at the same time as aiding REDD through reducing pressure for further forest conversion to agriculture.

U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Agricultural Systems

JF - Agricultural Systems

SN - 0308-521X

ER -