Investor Protection, Cross-listing and Accounting Quality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Electronic versions


  • 2019 Investor Protection

    Accepted author manuscript, 459 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 26/11/99

Using 42,808 firm-year observations from 32 countries around the world, we investigate whether cross-listing in the US is associated with better accounting quality, and whether investor protection moderates the effect of cross-listing on accounting quality. Our main results show firms that are cross-listed in the US exhibit more timely reporting of losses, greater tendency to manage earnings downward, and more value relevance of accounting numbers as compared to their domestic counterparts. Cross-listed firms originating from high investor protection jurisdictions, particularly in high anti-director rights and common law countries, exhibit greater tendency to recognise a more timely reporting of losses and to manage earnings downward but exhibit lower value relevance of earnings as compared to cross-listed firms domiciled in low anti-director rights and non-common law countries. These results suggest that the strength of investor protection in home country plays an important role in determining the quality of accounting numbers of cross-listed firms.


  • Cross-listing, accounting quality, conservatism, value-relevance, earnings management
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Nov 2019
View graph of relations