Investor Protection, Cross-listing and Accounting Quality
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 100179, 04.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Investor Protection, Cross-listing and Accounting Quality
AU - Kamarudin, Khairul Annuar
AU - Ariff, Akmalia
AU - Jaafar, Aziz
N1 - 18 months embargo
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Using 42,808 firm-year observations from 32 countries around the world, we investigate whether cross-listing in the US is associated with better accounting quality, and whether investor protection moderates the effect of cross-listing on accounting quality. Our main results show firms that are cross-listed in the US exhibit more timely reporting of losses, greater tendency to manage earnings downward, and more value relevance of accounting numbers as compared to their domestic counterparts. Cross-listed firms originating from high investor protection jurisdictions, particularly in high anti-director rights and common law countries, exhibit greater tendency to recognise a more timely reporting of losses and to manage earnings downward but exhibit lower value relevance of earnings as compared to cross-listed firms domiciled in low anti-director rights and non-common law countries. These results suggest that the strength of investor protection in home country plays an important role in determining the quality of accounting numbers of cross-listed firms.
AB - Using 42,808 firm-year observations from 32 countries around the world, we investigate whether cross-listing in the US is associated with better accounting quality, and whether investor protection moderates the effect of cross-listing on accounting quality. Our main results show firms that are cross-listed in the US exhibit more timely reporting of losses, greater tendency to manage earnings downward, and more value relevance of accounting numbers as compared to their domestic counterparts. Cross-listed firms originating from high investor protection jurisdictions, particularly in high anti-director rights and common law countries, exhibit greater tendency to recognise a more timely reporting of losses and to manage earnings downward but exhibit lower value relevance of earnings as compared to cross-listed firms domiciled in low anti-director rights and non-common law countries. These results suggest that the strength of investor protection in home country plays an important role in determining the quality of accounting numbers of cross-listed firms.
KW - Cross-listing
KW - accounting quality
KW - conservatism
KW - value-relevance
KW - earnings management
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcae.2019.100179
DO - 10.1016/j.jcae.2019.100179
M3 - Article
VL - 16
JO - Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics
JF - Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics
SN - 1815-5669
IS - 1
M1 - 100179
ER -