Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard Standard

Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt? / Machura, Stefan.
In: Soziale Systeme, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 06.06.2020, p. 331-354.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

HarvardHarvard

Machura, S 2020, 'Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?', Soziale Systeme, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

APA

Machura, S. (2020). Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt? Soziale Systeme, 22(1-2), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

CBE

Machura S. 2020. Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?. Soziale Systeme. 22(1-2):331-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

MLA

Machura, Stefan. "Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?". Soziale Systeme. 2020, 22(1-2). 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

VancouverVancouver

Machura S. Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt? Soziale Systeme. 2020 Jun 6;22(1-2):331-354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

Author

Machura, Stefan. / Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?. In: Soziale Systeme. 2020 ; Vol. 22, No. 1-2. pp. 331-354.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legitimation durch Verfahren – Was bleibt?

AU - Machura, Stefan

N1 - The article appears in 2020 in the journal volume for "2017". There has been a long delay in the journal's production timetable - so I was told.

PY - 2020/6/6

Y1 - 2020/6/6

N2 - In 1969, Niklas Luhmann published his book ”Legitimation durch Verfahren”(Legitimation by Procedure), which was widely quoted in German-speakingcountries. This book soon provoked a fierce debate. Contrary to the establishedview, Luhmann stated that institutions produce their own legitimacy withthe social mechanism of procedures, regardless of the intentions of the parties. Nowadays, empirical research has shown that procedural fairness is pivotal for the acceptance of decisions and for the legitimacy of the authorities. Even more, The behaviour of the people representing the authority is of paramount importance.The article argues that to elicit legitimation, procedures must demonstratethat they are fairly conducted. The development can be characterized as fromlegitimation by procedure to legitimation by fair procedure.

AB - In 1969, Niklas Luhmann published his book ”Legitimation durch Verfahren”(Legitimation by Procedure), which was widely quoted in German-speakingcountries. This book soon provoked a fierce debate. Contrary to the establishedview, Luhmann stated that institutions produce their own legitimacy withthe social mechanism of procedures, regardless of the intentions of the parties. Nowadays, empirical research has shown that procedural fairness is pivotal for the acceptance of decisions and for the legitimacy of the authorities. Even more, The behaviour of the people representing the authority is of paramount importance.The article argues that to elicit legitimation, procedures must demonstratethat they are fairly conducted. The development can be characterized as fromlegitimation by procedure to legitimation by fair procedure.

KW - Legitimation

KW - Legitimation by procedure

KW - procedural justice

KW - Niklas Luhmann

KW - Sociology of Law

KW - Sociological theory

KW - Court procedure

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

DO - https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

M3 - Erthygl

VL - 22

SP - 331

EP - 354

JO - Soziale Systeme

JF - Soziale Systeme

SN - 0948-423X

IS - 1-2

ER -