Making messy data work for conservation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: One Earth, Vol. 2, No. 5, 22.05.2020, p. 455-465.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Making messy data work for conservation
AU - Dobson, Andrew D.M.
AU - Milner-Gulland, EJ
AU - Aebischer, Nicholas J
AU - Beale, Colin
AU - Brozovic, Robert
AU - Coals, Peter
AU - Critchlow, Rob
AU - Dancer, Anthony
AU - Greve, Michelle
AU - Hinsley, Amy
AU - Ibbett, Harriet
AU - Johnston, Alison
AU - Kuiper, Tomothy
AU - Le Comber, Steven
AU - Mahood, Simon P
AU - Moore, Jennifer F.
AU - Nilsen, Erlend B
AU - Pocock, Michael J.O.
AU - Quinn, Anthony
AU - Travers, Henry
AU - Wilfred, Paulo
AU - Wright, Joss
AU - Keane, Aidan
PY - 2020/5/22
Y1 - 2020/5/22
N2 - Conservationists increasingly use unstructured observational data, such as citizen science records or ranger patrol observations, to guide decision making. These datasets are often large and relatively cheap to collect, and they have enormous potential. However, the resulting data are generally ‘‘messy,’’ and their use can incur considerable costs, some of which are hidden. We present an overview of the opportunities and limitations associated with messy data by explaining how the preferences, skills, and incentives of data collectors affect the quality of the information they contain and the investment required to unlock their potential. Drawing widely from across the sciences, we break down elements of the observation process in order to highlight likely sources of bias and error while emphasizing the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. We pro- pose a framework for appraising messy data to guide those engaging with these types of dataset and make them work for conservation and broader sustainability applications.
AB - Conservationists increasingly use unstructured observational data, such as citizen science records or ranger patrol observations, to guide decision making. These datasets are often large and relatively cheap to collect, and they have enormous potential. However, the resulting data are generally ‘‘messy,’’ and their use can incur considerable costs, some of which are hidden. We present an overview of the opportunities and limitations associated with messy data by explaining how the preferences, skills, and incentives of data collectors affect the quality of the information they contain and the investment required to unlock their potential. Drawing widely from across the sciences, we break down elements of the observation process in order to highlight likely sources of bias and error while emphasizing the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. We pro- pose a framework for appraising messy data to guide those engaging with these types of dataset and make them work for conservation and broader sustainability applications.
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.012
M3 - Article
VL - 2
SP - 455
EP - 465
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
SN - 2590-3330
IS - 5
ER -