Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning. / Diveica, Veronica; Muraki, Emiko J.; Binney, Richard J. et al.
In: Cognition, Vol. 248, 105794, 07.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

Diveica, V., Muraki, E. J., Binney, R. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2024). Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning. Cognition, 248, Article 105794. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105794

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Diveica V, Muraki EJ, Binney RJ, Pexman PM. Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning. Cognition. 2024 Jul;248:105794. Epub 2024 Apr 23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105794

Author

Diveica, Veronica ; Muraki, Emiko J. ; Binney, Richard J. et al. / Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning. In: Cognition. 2024 ; Vol. 248.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping Semantic Space: Exploring the Higher-order Structure of Word Meaning

AU - Diveica, Veronica

AU - Muraki, Emiko J.

AU - Binney, Richard J.

AU - Pexman, Penny M.

PY - 2024/4/23

Y1 - 2024/4/23

N2 - Multiple representation theories posit that concepts are represented via a combination of properties derived from sensorimotor, affective, and linguistic experiences. Recently, it has been proposed that information derived from social experience, or socialness, represents another key aspect of conceptual representation. How these various dimensions interact to form a coherent conceptual space has yet to be fully explored. To address this, we capitalized on openly available word property norms for 6339 words and conducted a large-scale investigation into the relationships between 18 dimensions. An exploratory factor analysis reduced the dimensions to six higher-order factors: sub-lexical, distributional, visuotactile, body action, affective and social interaction. All these factors explained unique variance in performance on lexical and semantic tasks, demonstrating that they make important contributions to the representation of word meaning. An important and novel finding was that the socialness dimension clustered with the auditory modality and with mouth and head actions. We suggest this reflects experiential learning from verbal interpersonal interactions. Moreover, formally modelling the network structure of semantic space revealed pairwise partial correlations between most dimensions and highlighted the centrality of the interoception dimension. Altogether, these findings provide new insights into the architecture of conceptual space, including the central importance of inner and social experience, and highlight important avenues for future research.

AB - Multiple representation theories posit that concepts are represented via a combination of properties derived from sensorimotor, affective, and linguistic experiences. Recently, it has been proposed that information derived from social experience, or socialness, represents another key aspect of conceptual representation. How these various dimensions interact to form a coherent conceptual space has yet to be fully explored. To address this, we capitalized on openly available word property norms for 6339 words and conducted a large-scale investigation into the relationships between 18 dimensions. An exploratory factor analysis reduced the dimensions to six higher-order factors: sub-lexical, distributional, visuotactile, body action, affective and social interaction. All these factors explained unique variance in performance on lexical and semantic tasks, demonstrating that they make important contributions to the representation of word meaning. An important and novel finding was that the socialness dimension clustered with the auditory modality and with mouth and head actions. We suggest this reflects experiential learning from verbal interpersonal interactions. Moreover, formally modelling the network structure of semantic space revealed pairwise partial correlations between most dimensions and highlighted the centrality of the interoception dimension. Altogether, these findings provide new insights into the architecture of conceptual space, including the central importance of inner and social experience, and highlight important avenues for future research.

KW - semantic memory

KW - social semantics

KW - grounded cognition

KW - embodied cognition

KW - distributional

KW - experiential

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105794

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105794

M3 - Article

VL - 248

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

M1 - 105794

ER -