Standard Standard

Marine Insurance Warranty: Comparing Common and Civil Law Approaches and their Implications for the Reform of Chinese Law. / Jing, Zhen.
In: Journal of Business Law, Vol. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 218-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marine Insurance Warranty

T2 - Comparing Common and Civil Law Approaches and their Implications for the Reform of Chinese Law

AU - Jing, Zhen

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [Marine Insurance Warranty: Comparing Common and Civil Law Approaches and their Implications for the Reform of Chinese Law] following peer review. The definitive published version Marine Insurance Warranty: Comparing Common and Civil Law Approaches and their Implications for the Reform of Chinese Law Jing, Z. 2017 In : Journal of Business Law. 3, p. 218-236] is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - For risk management, ‘warranty’ provisions in common law serve to define the risk insured, whereas civil law countries adopt an ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine. The term ‘warranty’ under Chinese marine insurance law is derived from English law, whereas in its general insurance law China at the same time also adopts an ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine to control risk. The need for a reform of insurance warranty law has prompted much scholarly debate. Following a thorough discussion of the status quo of warranty law in China, this paper further explores the reformed warranty law under the Insurance Act 2015 in England, together with the general ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine in civil law countries. It is argued that blindly importing relevant articles from the Insurance Act 2015 is not a feasible solution, as this will not only create more disputes, but will also create inconsistency with other laws. The paper concludes by suggesting that maybe adopting the ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine is a better way to replace the current warranty law under Chinese marine insurance law.

AB - For risk management, ‘warranty’ provisions in common law serve to define the risk insured, whereas civil law countries adopt an ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine. The term ‘warranty’ under Chinese marine insurance law is derived from English law, whereas in its general insurance law China at the same time also adopts an ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine to control risk. The need for a reform of insurance warranty law has prompted much scholarly debate. Following a thorough discussion of the status quo of warranty law in China, this paper further explores the reformed warranty law under the Insurance Act 2015 in England, together with the general ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine in civil law countries. It is argued that blindly importing relevant articles from the Insurance Act 2015 is not a feasible solution, as this will not only create more disputes, but will also create inconsistency with other laws. The paper concludes by suggesting that maybe adopting the ‘alteration of risk’ doctrine is a better way to replace the current warranty law under Chinese marine insurance law.

KW - risk management

KW - warranty

KW - Chinese Marine Code

KW - Insurance Act 2015

KW - alteration of risk

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 218

EP - 236

JO - Journal of Business Law

JF - Journal of Business Law

SN - 0021-9460

ER -