Old-growth forest loss and secondary forest recovery across Amazonian countries

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

Other documents

  • Charlotte Smith
    Lancaster University
  • John Healey
  • Erika Berenguer
    Lancaster UniversityUniversity of Oxford
  • Paul Young
    Lancaster University
  • Taylor Ben
    Lancaster University
  • Fernando Elias
    EMBRAPA Amazonia Oriental
  • Fernando Espirito-Santo
    University of Leicester
  • Jos Barlow
    Lancaster University
There is growing recognition of the potential of large-scale forest restoration in the Amazon as a “nature-based solution” to climate change. However, our knowledge of forest loss and recovery beyond Brazil is limited, and carbon emissions and accumulation have not been estimated for the whole biome. Combining a 33-year land cover dataset with estimates of above-ground biomass and carbon sequestration rates, we evaluate forest loss and recovery across nine Amazonian countries and at a local scale. We also estimate the role of secondary forests in offsetting old-growth deforestation emissions and explore the temporal trends in forest loss and recovery. We find secondary forests across the biome to have offset just 9.7% of carbon emissions from old-growth deforestation, despite occupying 27.6% of deforested land. However, these numbers varied between countries ranging from 9.0% in Brazil to 23.8% in Guyana for carbon offsetting, and 24.8% in Brazil to 56.9% in Ecuador for forest area recovery. We reveal a strong, negative spatial relationship between old-growth forest loss and recovery by secondary forests, showing that regions with the greatest potential for large-scale restoration are also those that currently have the lowest recovery (e.g. Brazil dominates deforestation and emissions but has the lowest recovery). In addition, a temporal analysis of the regions that were >80% deforested in 1997 shows a continued decline in overall forest cover. Our findings identify three important challenges: (1) incentivising large-scale restoration in highly deforested regions, (2) protecting secondary forests without disadvantaging landowners who depend on farm-fallow systems, and (3) preventing further deforestation. Combatting all these successfully is essential to ensuring that the Amazon biome achieves its potential in mitigating anthropogenic climate change.

Keywords

  • carbon sequestration, climate change, forest regeneration, human-modified landscapes, restoration, secondary vegetation, tropical forest
Original languageEnglish
Article number085009
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume16
Issue number8
Early online date22 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2021

Research outputs (1)

View all

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations