Pitching business school researcher profiles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

  • JAL-10-2022-0105_RevisedManuscript_Anonymous_16July2023

    Accepted author manuscript, 727 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 21/03/25

DOI

  • Robert Faff
    University of Queensland
  • David Mathuva
  • Mark Brosnan
  • Sebastian Hoffmann
  • Catalin Albu
  • Searat Ali
  • Micheal Axelsen
  • Nikki Cornwell
  • Adrian Gepp
  • Chelsea Gill
  • Karina Honey
  • Ihtisham Malik
  • Vishal Mehrotra
  • Olayinka Moses
  • Raluca Valeria Ratiu
  • David Tan
  • Maciej Andrzej Tuszkiewicz
Purpose The authors passively apply a researcher profile pitch (RPP) template tool in accounting and across a range of Business School disciplines. Design/methodology/approach The authors document a diversity of worked examples of the RPP. Using an auto-ethnographic research design, each showcased researcher reflects on the exercise, highlighting nuanced perspectives drawn from their experience. Collectively, these examples and associated independent narratives allow the authors to identify common themes that provide informative insights to potential users. Findings First, the RPP tool is helpful for accounting scholars to portray their essential research stream. Moreover, the tool proved universally meaningful and applicable irrespective of research discipline or research experience. Second, it offers a distinct advantage over existing popular research profile platforms, because it demands a focused “less”, that delivers a meaningful “more”. Further, the conciseness of the RPP design makes it readily amenable to iteration and dynamism. Third, the authors have identified specific situations of added value, e.g. initiating research collaborations and academic job market preparation. Practical implications The RPP tool can provide the basis for developing a scalable interactive researcher exchange platform. Originality/value The authors argue that the RPP tool potentially adds meaningful incremental value relative to existing popular platforms for gaining researcher visibility. This additional value derives from the systematic RPP format, combined with the benefit of easy familiarity and strong emphasis on succinctness. Additionally, the authors argue that the RPP adds a depth of nuanced novel information often not contained in other platforms, e.g. around the dimensions of “data” and “tools”. Further, the RPP gives the researcher a “personality”, most notably through the dimensions of “contribution” and “other considerations”.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Accounting Literature
Early online date21 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Sept 2023
View graph of relations