Population characteristics and predation rates of the dominant soft bodied and durophagous predators on temperate intertidal shores.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 11, No. 6, 240308, 06.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Population characteristics and predation rates of the dominant soft bodied and durophagous predators on temperate intertidal shores.
AU - Peck, Lloyd S.
AU - Mance, Hannah
AU - Ellis, Miles
AU - Matok, Daniel
AU - Grange, Laura
N1 - © 2024 The Authors.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Substantial research exists on predation and its ecology. Most research has focused on durophagous fishes, brachyuran crabs, and lobsters. Data are lacking, however, on soft-bodied predators like anemones, and their contribution to overall levels of predation remains largely unevaluated. Here, we compared predation rates of the durophagous predator, the crab C. maenas and the soft-bodied predator, the anemone Actinia equina on 15 intertidal shores around Anglesey, north Wales, UK. We employed a novel approach to assess predation based on measuring faecal output from recently collected individuals and converting it to food consumed using absorption efficiencies (AEs) measured using potential prey species inhabiting the same shores. Anemone mean abundance was 8.21 (± 0.27, s.e.) individuals.m -2, whereas for C. maenas it was 0.23 (± 0.02, s.e.) individuals.m -2. AEs when fed mussel tissue, a polychaete worm, or a shrimp were 92.8-94.0% in C. maenas and 40.5-95.8% in A. equina. This difference in values reflected the different feeding modes of the two predators. Unexpectedly, A. equina consumed 3.5-7 times more prey than C. maenas. The consumption of larger amounts of prey by an anemone than the dominant durophagous predator has important consequences for calculating energy flows in food webs, understanding predation controls in assemblages, and potentially for wider predation trends.
AB - Substantial research exists on predation and its ecology. Most research has focused on durophagous fishes, brachyuran crabs, and lobsters. Data are lacking, however, on soft-bodied predators like anemones, and their contribution to overall levels of predation remains largely unevaluated. Here, we compared predation rates of the durophagous predator, the crab C. maenas and the soft-bodied predator, the anemone Actinia equina on 15 intertidal shores around Anglesey, north Wales, UK. We employed a novel approach to assess predation based on measuring faecal output from recently collected individuals and converting it to food consumed using absorption efficiencies (AEs) measured using potential prey species inhabiting the same shores. Anemone mean abundance was 8.21 (± 0.27, s.e.) individuals.m -2, whereas for C. maenas it was 0.23 (± 0.02, s.e.) individuals.m -2. AEs when fed mussel tissue, a polychaete worm, or a shrimp were 92.8-94.0% in C. maenas and 40.5-95.8% in A. equina. This difference in values reflected the different feeding modes of the two predators. Unexpectedly, A. equina consumed 3.5-7 times more prey than C. maenas. The consumption of larger amounts of prey by an anemone than the dominant durophagous predator has important consequences for calculating energy flows in food webs, understanding predation controls in assemblages, and potentially for wider predation trends.
U2 - 10.1098/rsos.240308
DO - 10.1098/rsos.240308
M3 - Article
C2 - 39100169
VL - 11
JO - Royal Society Open Science
JF - Royal Society Open Science
SN - 2054-5703
IS - 6
M1 - 240308
ER -