Standard Standard

Quantifying Social Semantics: An Inclusive Definition of Socialness and Ratings for 8,388 English Words. / Diveica, Veronica; Pexman, Penny M.; Binney, Richard J.
In: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 55, No. 2, 02.2023, p. 461-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Diveica V, Pexman PM, Binney RJ. Quantifying Social Semantics: An Inclusive Definition of Socialness and Ratings for 8,388 English Words. Behavior Research Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):461-473. Epub 2022 Mar 14. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x

Author

Diveica, Veronica ; Pexman, Penny M. ; Binney, Richard J. / Quantifying Social Semantics: An Inclusive Definition of Socialness and Ratings for 8,388 English Words. In: Behavior Research Methods. 2023 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 461-473.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Social Semantics: An Inclusive Definition of Socialness and Ratings for 8,388 English Words

AU - Diveica, Veronica

AU - Pexman, Penny M.

AU - Binney, Richard J.

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2023/2

Y1 - 2023/2

N2 - It has been proposed that social experience plays an important role in the grounding of concepts, and socialness has been proffered as a fundamental organisational principle underpinning semantic representation in the human brain. However, the empirical support for these hypotheses is limited by inconsistencies in the way socialness has been defined and measured. To further advance theory, the field must establish a clearer working definition, and research efforts could be facilitated by the availability of an extensive set of socialness ratings for individual concepts. Therefore, in the current work, we employed a novel and inclusive definition to test the extent to which socialness is reliably perceived as a broad construct, and we report socialness norms for over 8000 English words, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Our inclusive socialness measure shows good reliability and validity, and our analyses suggest that the socialness ratings capture aspects of word meaning which are distinct to those measured by other pertinent semantic constructs, including concreteness and emotional valence. Finally, in a series of regression analyses, we show for the first time that the socialness of a word's meaning explains unique variance in participant performance on lexical tasks. Our dataset of socialness norms has considerable item overlap with those used in both other lexical/semantic norms and in available behavioural mega-studies. They can help target testable predictions about brain and behaviour derived from multiple representation theories and neurobiological accounts of social semantics.

AB - It has been proposed that social experience plays an important role in the grounding of concepts, and socialness has been proffered as a fundamental organisational principle underpinning semantic representation in the human brain. However, the empirical support for these hypotheses is limited by inconsistencies in the way socialness has been defined and measured. To further advance theory, the field must establish a clearer working definition, and research efforts could be facilitated by the availability of an extensive set of socialness ratings for individual concepts. Therefore, in the current work, we employed a novel and inclusive definition to test the extent to which socialness is reliably perceived as a broad construct, and we report socialness norms for over 8000 English words, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Our inclusive socialness measure shows good reliability and validity, and our analyses suggest that the socialness ratings capture aspects of word meaning which are distinct to those measured by other pertinent semantic constructs, including concreteness and emotional valence. Finally, in a series of regression analyses, we show for the first time that the socialness of a word's meaning explains unique variance in participant performance on lexical tasks. Our dataset of socialness norms has considerable item overlap with those used in both other lexical/semantic norms and in available behavioural mega-studies. They can help target testable predictions about brain and behaviour derived from multiple representation theories and neurobiological accounts of social semantics.

KW - Grounded cognition

KW - Lexical decisions

KW - Semantic cognition

KW - Social cognition

KW - Word ratings

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x

DO - 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 35286618

VL - 55

SP - 461

EP - 473

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-3528

IS - 2

ER -