Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results? / Gibbons, James M.; Nicholson, Emily; Milner-Gulland, E.J. et al.
In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.10.2011, p. 1218-1226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Gibbons, JM, Nicholson, E, Milner-Gulland, EJ & Jones, JPG 2011, 'Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1218-1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Gibbons JM, Nicholson E, Milner-Gulland EJ, Jones JPG. Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results? Journal of Applied Ecology. 2011 Oct 1;48(5):1218-1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

Author

Gibbons, James M. ; Nicholson, Emily ; Milner-Gulland, E.J. et al. / Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2011 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 1218-1226.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?

AU - Gibbons, James M.

AU - Nicholson, Emily

AU - Milner-Gulland, E.J.

AU - Jones, Julia P.G.

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1218

EP - 1226

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 1365-2664

IS - 5

ER -