Systems Theory and Procedure

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Standard Standard

Systems Theory and Procedure. / Machura, Stefan.
Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. ed. / Ralf Rogowski. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2025.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Machura, S 2025, Systems Theory and Procedure. in R Rogowski (ed.), Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

APA

Machura, S. (in press). Systems Theory and Procedure. In R. Rogowski (Ed.), Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory Edward Elgar.

CBE

Machura S. 2025. Systems Theory and Procedure. Rogowski R, editor. In Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

MLA

Machura, Stefan "Systems Theory and Procedure". Rogowski, Ralf (ed.). Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2025.

VancouverVancouver

Machura S. Systems Theory and Procedure. In Rogowski R, editor, Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2025

Author

Machura, Stefan. / Systems Theory and Procedure. Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory. editor / Ralf Rogowski. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2025.

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Systems Theory and Procedure

AU - Machura, Stefan

PY - 2025/2/28

Y1 - 2025/2/28

N2 - Procedures serve to legitimate decisions independent of their content which may not convince all, especially the losing party (Niklas Luhmann). In procedures, parties are required to take up roles and they are expected to react to the arguments of others. In the end, having engaged voluntarily, the losing party learns that they must accept the decision. With his theory of procedure, Luhmann delivers a key concept for the understanding of societies which can no longer rely on a system of belief shared by all and which undergo rapid changes. The debate on Luhmann’s theory highlights differences between traditional ways of viewing procedures, namely only as a tool to arrive at a just decision, and a sociological analysis recognising wider functions of procedures. These include exhausting and socially isolating parties, binding them to decisions, and the public potentially developing trust in the system. Procedures are effective when they comply with general expectations of procedural fairness, later research accentuates Luhmann’s concept. This critical review shows how his theory can be amended.

AB - Procedures serve to legitimate decisions independent of their content which may not convince all, especially the losing party (Niklas Luhmann). In procedures, parties are required to take up roles and they are expected to react to the arguments of others. In the end, having engaged voluntarily, the losing party learns that they must accept the decision. With his theory of procedure, Luhmann delivers a key concept for the understanding of societies which can no longer rely on a system of belief shared by all and which undergo rapid changes. The debate on Luhmann’s theory highlights differences between traditional ways of viewing procedures, namely only as a tool to arrive at a just decision, and a sociological analysis recognising wider functions of procedures. These include exhausting and socially isolating parties, binding them to decisions, and the public potentially developing trust in the system. Procedures are effective when they comply with general expectations of procedural fairness, later research accentuates Luhmann’s concept. This critical review shows how his theory can be amended.

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Legitimacy of law

KW - Systems theory

KW - Niklas Luhmann

KW - Court procedure

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Sociology of law

M3 - Chapter

BT - Research Handbook on Law and Systems Theory

A2 - Rogowski, Ralf

PB - Edward Elgar

CY - Cheltenham

ER -