The causes and extent of split sovereign credit ratings in emerging markets.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

The causes and extent of split sovereign credit ratings in emerging markets. / Alsakka, R.; ap Gwilym, Owain.
In: Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 4-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Alsakka R, ap Gwilym O. The causes and extent of split sovereign credit ratings in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2012 Jan 1;48(1):4-24. doi: 10.2753/REE1540-496X480101

Author

Alsakka, R. ; ap Gwilym, Owain. / The causes and extent of split sovereign credit ratings in emerging markets. In: Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2012 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 4-24.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The causes and extent of split sovereign credit ratings in emerging markets.

AU - Alsakka, R.

AU - ap Gwilym, Owain

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Sovereign credit rating actions have attracted considerable attention recently. This study employs a rich and unique data set of ratings from six international agencies to investigate the causes of split sovereign ratings in emerging countries. Three reasons are identified in explaining the relatively high frequency of disagreement across agencies on emerging sovereign ratings. First, rating agencies use different economic factors and different weights on those factors. Second, rating agencies disagree to a greater extent about more opaque issuers. Third, for smaller rating agencies, issuers in their "home region" tend to be more favored. The findings should be of interest to a wide range of participants in global credit markets.

AB - Sovereign credit rating actions have attracted considerable attention recently. This study employs a rich and unique data set of ratings from six international agencies to investigate the causes of split sovereign ratings in emerging countries. Three reasons are identified in explaining the relatively high frequency of disagreement across agencies on emerging sovereign ratings. First, rating agencies use different economic factors and different weights on those factors. Second, rating agencies disagree to a greater extent about more opaque issuers. Third, for smaller rating agencies, issuers in their "home region" tend to be more favored. The findings should be of interest to a wide range of participants in global credit markets.

U2 - 10.2753/REE1540-496X480101

DO - 10.2753/REE1540-496X480101

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 4

EP - 24

JO - Emerging Markets Finance and Trade

JF - Emerging Markets Finance and Trade

IS - 1

ER -