The earlier the better? Individual participant data and traditional meta-analysis of age effects of parenting interventions
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Child Development, Vol. 90, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 7-19.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The earlier the better? Individual participant data and traditional meta-analysis of age effects of parenting interventions
AU - Gardner, Frances
AU - Leijten, Patti
AU - Melendez-Torres, G.J.
AU - Landau, Sabine
AU - Harris, Victoria
AU - Mann, Joanna
AU - Beecham, Jenny
AU - Hutchings, Judy
AU - Scott, Stephen
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Strong arguments have been made for early intervention for child problems, stating that early is more effective than later, as the brain is more malleable, and costs are lower. However, there is scant evidence from trials to support this hypothesis, which we therefore tested in two well-powered, state-of-the-art meta-analyses with complementary strengths: (a) Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of European trials of Incredible Years parenting intervention (k = 13, n = 1696; age = 2-11); (b) Larger, trial-level robust variance estimation meta-analysis of a wider range of parenting programs (k = 156, n = 13,378, Mage = 2-10) for reducing disruptive behavior. Both analyses found no evidence that intervention earlier in childhood was more effective; programs targeted at a narrower age range were no more effective than general ones.
AB - Strong arguments have been made for early intervention for child problems, stating that early is more effective than later, as the brain is more malleable, and costs are lower. However, there is scant evidence from trials to support this hypothesis, which we therefore tested in two well-powered, state-of-the-art meta-analyses with complementary strengths: (a) Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of European trials of Incredible Years parenting intervention (k = 13, n = 1696; age = 2-11); (b) Larger, trial-level robust variance estimation meta-analysis of a wider range of parenting programs (k = 156, n = 13,378, Mage = 2-10) for reducing disruptive behavior. Both analyses found no evidence that intervention earlier in childhood was more effective; programs targeted at a narrower age range were no more effective than general ones.
U2 - 10.1111/cdev.13138
DO - 10.1111/cdev.13138
M3 - Article
VL - 90
SP - 7
EP - 19
JO - Child Development
JF - Child Development
SN - 1467-8624
IS - 1
ER -